My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005363
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MINER
>
647
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545553
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005363
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2020 12:16:40 AM
Creation date
3/17/2020 2:24:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005363
RECORD_ID
PR0545553
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006207
FACILITY_NAME
VALLEY VOLKSWAGEN
STREET_NUMBER
647
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MINER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
647 E MINER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> i <br /> ' Indoor and Outdoor Exposure <br /> Currently, only the potential for outdoor exposure exists. Given the proximity of the sidewalk <br /> and Stanisiaus St. it is not expected that structures will be erected over the contaminated area. <br /> ' The sole exposure pathway evaluated, therefore, was volatilization from soil to outdoor air. <br /> Potential Receptor Scenarios <br /> ' <br /> Exposure to vapors b human receptors can be modeled under two scenarios residential or <br /> Po Po Y p <br /> commercial. <br /> Risk under a residential use scenario is higher than under a commercial use setting. The reasons <br /> for this are the extended daily, weekly and lifetime periods of exposure under the residential <br /> ' scenario as well as the greater health sensitivity of infants and children. <br /> ' Risk was evaluated for both commercial and residential property uses. <br /> Parameters Used in the Risk Evaluation <br /> ' Potential health risk was evaluated using the computer program RSCA Tool Kit for Chemical <br /> Releases by Groundwater Services, Inc., 1998. This program incorporates (with some <br /> ' modifications) the default chemical, toxicological, exposure, hydrogeological and physical <br /> parameters used in ASTM guidance for risk-based corrective actions (ASTM PS-104, 1998). <br /> The program also uses the transport/concentration models and equations from the ASTM <br /> document. <br /> The default parameters used by the program are intentionally very conservative (maximizing <br /> ' indicated health risk) and are designed as a screening measure. In general, more realistic <br /> parameters are substituted for default parameters where measured site characteristics are <br /> significantly different than default values. <br /> ' In our analysis, the parameters below were modified from the default values: <br /> ' Cancer Potency Factors ("Slope Factors') <br /> Of the chemicals of concern at the site, benzene is the only known carcinogen, and this was the <br /> ' controlling risk factor. For non-carcinogens, toxicity as quantified by the reference dose (Rfd) <br /> controls the acceptable exposure levels. For carcinogens, cancer potency factors (or "slope <br /> factors"), in units of mg/kg-day-' are designed to be multiplied by any particular daily dose of <br /> ' a carcinogen in units of mg/kg-day, the product of which multiplication is the incremental <br /> increase in cancer risk at that dose. For vapor inhalation, the cancer slope factor can be <br /> translated into a "unit risk factor" which describes the cancer risk accorded exposure to a <br /> 1 <br /> velieyvwlreporislrbal.txt <br /> 3 <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.