My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005153
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MONTE DIABLO
>
1766
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0535112
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005153
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2020 1:02:02 AM
Creation date
3/17/2020 3:03:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005153
RECORD_ID
PR0535112
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0020296
FACILITY_NAME
CHAPIN BROTHERS INC
STREET_NUMBER
1766
STREET_NAME
MONTE DIABLO
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13505050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1766 MONTE DIABLO AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 24, 1996 Quarterly Monitoring Report <br /> Chapin Brothers Automobile Repair Facility Stockton, California <br /> :k <br /> 2.0 SAMPLING PROTOCOL <br /> Lush Geosciences conducted a quarterly monitoring event on March 20, 1996. The work <br /> consisted of: <br /> LI <br /> I. Measuring the depth to water and checking for the presence of free product in each of the <br /> wells (no free product was enco,untered); <br /> 2. Purging groundwater from the wells and collecting and analyzing groundwater samples <br /> Lfrom each of the monitoring wells; <br /> k <br /> 3. Preparing a groundwater potentiometric surface map indicating the direction of <br /> groundwater flow at the time of sampling; and <br /> 4. Preparing this report. <br /> The following sections summarize field methods used in association with the collection <br /> of groundwater samples at the site. <br /> 2.1 Subjective Inspection <br /> Prior to purging or sampling, the wellheads were inspected and found to be in good <br /> condition. Water was present in all of the well boxes due to infiltration of surface water through <br /> the wellhead covers. A disposable plastic bailer was lowered to the groundwater surface, <br /> retrieved, and inspected for floating product or other subjective evidence of contamination. No <br /> �k <br /> floating product was present. An electronic water level indicator was used to measure the depth <br /> to groundwater and the total depth of each well relative to a surveyed mark on the wellhead. The <br /> thickness of the water column was then used to calculate the volume of water in the well and thus <br /> to arrive at a calculated minimum purge volume. <br /> 2.2 Well Purging <br /> Prior to sample collection, each'well was purged of 30 to 50 gals of groundwater using a <br /> r1.5-in diameter decontaminated submersible electric pump. The volumes purged correspond to a <br /> LL�p.• minimum of three well volumes (easing and gravel pack volume). Table 1 lists the date of <br /> sampling, depth to water, and field measurements of pH, temperature and electrical conductivity. <br /> _ h <br /> 530-001 w - 3 - <br /> LUSx GEOSCIENCES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.