My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005179
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MONTE DIABLO
>
1766
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0535112
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005179
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2020 12:55:22 AM
Creation date
3/17/2020 3:45:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005179
RECORD_ID
PR0535112
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0020296
FACILITY_NAME
CHAPIN BROTHERS INC
STREET_NUMBER
1766
STREET_NAME
MONTE DIABLO
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13505050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1766 MONTE DIABLO AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Soil generated during the removal of these tanks was transported by Thorpe Oil to a site owned by <br /> Chapin Brothers,Inc on Beyer Lane, east of the city of Stockton(Figure 1) The excavated soil was <br /> ' placed in a containment cell constructed of bales of hay and lined with plastic sheeting The <br /> stockpile was estimated at approximately 250 cubic yards <br /> Soil samples were collected from the stockpiled soil to characterize the extent of contamination <br /> present in the soil (Figure 2) Three samples were collected for every approximate 50 cubic yards <br /> of soil by removing 8 to 12 inches of soil from the surface of the pile and then driving a hand- <br /> operated percussion core sampler and clean stainless steel sleeve into the soil The sleeve was <br /> removed from the sampler and end caps and duct tape were used to seal the sample container Each <br /> sample was labeled and placed in iced storage until delivered to the environmental laboratory for <br /> ' analytical testing The three soil samples from each 50 cubic yards were composited by the <br /> laboratory and were tested for TPHg and BTEX The results of these tests indicated that relatively <br /> ' low concentrations of TPHg.were present in the soil (Table 1) <br /> SOIL REMEDIATION WORK <br /> Uncontrolled soil aeration was permitted by the San Joaquin County Air Pollution Control District <br /> because 1) concentrations of TPHg were relatively low, 2) the total amount of soil was only 250 <br /> ' cubic yards,and 3)the location of the proposed aeration was not upwind or near occupied residential <br /> property Stockpiled soil was spread over an access road through the orchard during late August, <br /> 1993, by the owner under the supervision of a State of California Registered Geologist The soil <br /> was spread to an approximate thickness of 8 to 12 inches over the surface of the road and allowed <br /> to aerate The soil was disced and then tilled at least once a week for approximately three months <br /> ' The aerated soil was sampled on November 26, 1993, to verify completion of the soil aeration <br /> project Three individual soil samples were collected for every approximate 50 cubic yards of soil <br /> These individual samples were composited by the laboratory for analytical testing The soil samples <br /> ' were analyzed for TPHg and BTEX using EPA Methods 8015 modified/5030 and EPA Method <br /> 8020,respectively,by Matrix Environmental Laboratories, Inc of Rancho Cordova, California All <br /> ' samples were collected using a hand-operated percussion core sampler by first removing the upper <br /> 2 inches of soil and then driving the sampler containing a clean stainless steel sample sleeve <br /> vertically through the soil layer so that the sample was collected near the bottom of the layer A <br /> ' composite sample consisting of three individual soil samples was collected from the native soil <br /> beneath the aerated soil layer to verify that gasoline contaminants had not leached during the project <br /> Sample locations are indicated on Figure 3 <br /> ' CONCLUSIONS <br /> ' Laboratory results of the analyses performed on the soil samples collected from the aerated soil layer <br /> indicated that TPHg and BTEX no longer were present in the soil at concentrations at or greater than <br /> the minimum detection limits of the laboratory methods Further, no odor of gasoline was detected <br /> during sampling The success of the aeration project was aided by the sandy consistency of the soil <br /> and the low initial concentrations of TPHg detected in the soil Contamination was not detected in <br /> ' 2731 QUAIL STREET DAVIS,CALIFORNIA 95616 916 7S6 1441 <br /> GE 004-010 srr 3 GRAYLAND ENVIRONMENTAL <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.