Laserfiche WebLink
01 March 1999 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0103 <br /> Page 5 of 8 <br /> 3.3. IN-SITU AIR SPARGING <br /> Elevated concentrations of dissolved oxygen were detected in monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-4, <br /> and the ASO wells, on-site as compared to off site wells representing background dissolved oxygen <br /> concentrations. <br /> Over the last quarter of IAS injection,the dissolved oxygen concentrations for wells ASO-1, MW-1, <br /> ASO-2 and ASO-3, were once measure to be 51.5%, 77.1%, 46.6% and 70.2%, respectively. Over <br /> the last quarter well MW-4 had a high dissolved oxygen concentrations of 88%. The more distal <br /> _ down-gradient wells MW-2, MW-6, MW-3, MW-5 and MW-7 had high dissolved oxygen <br /> concentrations of 4.2%, 4.3%, 3.1%, 28% and 8.9%, respectively. <br /> The dissolved oxygen data is summarized on Table 4. Sparging rates were measured at <br /> approximately 10 scfm during each monitoring event.A minimum pressure of 12 psi was maintained <br /> for the air sparging flow rate. <br /> 3.5. SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION <br /> The SVE unit operated at varying rates during this quarter. Extraction flow rates were calculated to <br /> range from 180 to 185 scfm. Typically, the operation averaged I80 scfm during the period. An <br /> induced vacuum (negative pressure) of 40 inches of water was measured in the piping between the <br /> blower and extraction wells. The radius of a measurable vacuum at the outlying wellheads was noted <br /> to extend 90 feet from VW-1 to MW-3, with a transmitted vacuum force (potential) of 0.27 inches <br /> of water. <br /> TPH-g was detected in one sample collected on 30 December 1998 from the influent vapor stream <br /> at a concentration of 100 4g11. This sample was collected with well VE-6 in the soil gas/vapor <br /> network. BTEX compounds were detected in the soil gas/vapor samples. The analytical results of <br /> soil-vapor samples are summarized on Table 5. The laboratory report (MAI Lab ID No. 01151 and <br /> 01152), Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) reports and chain-of-custody forms are <br /> included in Appendix B. <br /> 3.6. MASS OF RECOVERED HYDROCARBONS <br /> The hydrocarbon mass removed during the operating period was calculated using the following <br /> equation: M= C•Q•t <br /> where: M=cumulative mass recovered (kg) <br /> Advanced GeuEnvirunmental,Inc. <br />