Laserfiche WebLink
3-6 <br /> On the behalf of Sheldon, BC prepared a work plan addendum, dated July 9, 1993, to <br /> continue the excavation of affected soil. This work plan addendum was submitted to the County <br /> �- and verbally approved by the County on July 10, 1993, and in a letter dated August 4, 1993. The <br /> BC work plan addendum and County approval letter are included as Attachment D_ The <br /> additional excavation and stockpiling of hydrocarbon affected soil was resumed on July 19, 1993. <br /> As authorized by Sheldon, a BC geologist was present on-site to observe the excavation. A <br /> representative of J_H. Kleinfelder and Associates (Kleinfelder) was also present on-site to provide <br /> geotechnical expertise for the excavation process. Correspondence from Kleinfelder regarding <br /> the excavation work is provided in Attachment E. <br /> Soil was excavated based on visual identification of affected soil. The sidewalls and <br /> bottom of the excavation were occasionally sampled by BC and analyzed for BTEX, TPHg, <br /> TPHd, and TPHmo by WEST on a 24-hour rush basis to evaluate whether affected soil had been <br /> removed. Soil samples were collected under the supervision of a representative from the County. <br /> The location and depth of soil samples collected throughout the excavation are shown on Figure <br /> 3-2 and analytical results of the samples are summarized in Table 3-3. Excavation was <br /> terminated on August 6, 1993. The final size of the excavation averaged 65 feet wide by 100 <br /> feet long and ranged in depth from 20 to 44 feet below ground surface (Figure 3-2). A total of <br /> approximately 12,000 cubic yards of soil were excavated. <br /> w <br /> The size of the excavation was limited by physical and safety constraints. Therefore, <br /> some petroleum hydrocarbon affected soil was left in place in the western half of the excavation <br /> L underneath the ramp used by the excavator. Factors limiting the physical size of the excavation <br /> included the property line to the south, existing structures to the east and north, and limited <br /> working space and the two 2-inch gas pipelines to the west, where excavated soil was being <br /> �. stockpiled. <br /> As described in our September 3, 1993, Status Report to the County (Attachment F), the <br /> soil was shown not to exhibit the characteristics of a hazardous waste as defined in Title 22, <br /> Article 3, Chapter 11 of the California Code of Regulations. Specifically, the soil was shown <br /> 5 <br /> to be non-toxic, non-reactive, non-corrosive, and non-ignitable. The analytical reports <br /> +� documenting the toxicity, reactivity, corrosivity, and ignitability of the soil are included in <br /> Attachment F. Additionally, the hydrocarbons were shown to be non-leachable, based on TCLP <br /> analyses of soil samples. <br /> Based on the non-leachable and non-hazardous (Title 22, Article 3, Chapter 11) nature <br /> of the soil, BC recommended backfilling the excavation with the stockpiled material and <br /> L returning the site to its original (pre-excavation) condition. BC also recommended collecting <br /> Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction specified at the beginning of this doctunent. <br /> 1; R3\L\760MFF0R'iS�I LLT-0IL.0 L0 <br /> QMS-PS2200 <br /> 4 <br /> Yr <br />