Laserfiche WebLink
J'• v 't F rA°3-!h4�rq`11 s.�;' � S r<��i'�*t :,1�4f n;�r+.-,*,d �"7'��',i"'..� +y S�'�rt�� x^.n �}r� t +.����:.,�`P iT�„'+�`����d ?�'``, <br /> z rsx,F M.�sr X-=� r 61�t+k Tzar�lt l' Y r �'7Fp�J + �; ,� S 1. .� g, A' •-1- � <br /> YY k <br /> 7g <br /> t <br /> 35 <br /> GOLDEN GRAIN COMPANY <br /> December 21, 1989 <br /> 202/799-~5045.06 <br /> 5.0 REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES <br /> potential methods to clean up the soil and groundwater <br /> beneath the site are dictated largely by the depth and extent- of <br /> ume, and by subsurface geologic conditions. <br /> the hydrocarbon pl <br /> The remediation methods that were identified as possible <br /> alternatives for treatment of soil and groundwater a thetite as <br /> lity and <br /> were studied far the technical treatment QPtion5 that were studied <br /> of each remedial action. Tre treatment ag <br /> included: <br /> No action <br /> 2, physical containment <br /> Soil excavation <br /> a. Disposal of soil <br /> b. Treatment of soil <br /> 4. vapor extraction <br /> y, Groundwater extraction <br /> 6. Tn situ biodegradation <br /> 5.1 No ACTION <br /> The "no action" alternative would consist of a carefuli_y <br /> and sampling program to <br /> designed monitoring monitor the natural <br /> P <br /> attenuation of the levels of hydrocarbons. The natural breakdown <br /> of petroleum hydrocarbons in the subsurface through biodegrada- <br /> GI.WUNDW MAI <br />