Laserfiche WebLink
,'•{ SITE BACKGROUND <br /> ' In July 1986, a 500-gallon capacity underground storage tank (UST), identified as TK4, was removed <br /> from the site. Laboratory analyses of soil samples collected from the UST removal area in April 1987 <br /> indicated the soil was impacted with petroleum hydrocarbons. In February 1988, three remaining USTs <br /> were removed from the vicinity of the former location of TK4. Laboratory analyses of soil samples <br /> collected during removal of the three remaining USTs did not identify petroleum impacted soils. <br /> As a result of the soil contamination identified in April of 1987, the San Joaquin County Public Health <br /> Department/Environmental Health Division (SJCPHD/EHD) directed Eckert Cold Storage to conduct a <br /> site investigation and submit a Problem Assessment Report. In response to the directive from the <br /> SJCPHD/EHD, WHF, Inc. (WHF) installed three monitor wells identified as MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 <br /> in January 1995. During initial development of the wells, it was discovered that the well casing of MW-2 <br /> had been damaged during installation of the well, such that bailers and pumps could not be placed down <br /> ' the well. Because petroleum hydrocarbon contamination was noted in all three borings drilled for MW-1 <br /> through MW-3, WHF elected to use MW-2 for groundwater gradient data collection and install an <br /> additional well in the down-gradient direction. Consequently, an additional well (MW4) was installed at <br /> the site on March 22, 1995. <br /> On September 18 and 19, 1997, three additional monitor wells identified as MW-5, MW-6, and MW-7 <br /> were installed at the site. A sensitive receptor survey for the site was conducted by WHF in 1998. On <br /> November 2 and 3, 1999, WHF advanced four shallow soil borings to depths ranging from 38 to 41.5 feet <br /> below ground surface (bgs). Groundwater was reportedly encountered at approximately 23 feet bgs. One <br /> of the shallow borings was completed as an additional monitor well (MW-8). Additionally, a deep boring <br /> was advanced to a depth of 56.5 feet bgs to evaluate the vertical extent of contamination in the location <br /> of the former UST area. Petroleum hydrocarbon constituents were detected in all of the soil samples <br /> collected from the deep boring. <br /> ' WHF conducted quarterly groundwater monitoring activities at the site from April 1995 to December <br /> 2001. Condor conducted quarterly groundwater monitoring activities at the site on February 27, 2002, <br /> and prepared the First Quarter 2002 Groundwater Monitoring Report, dated April 26, 2002, describing <br /> the results of the monitoring. <br /> On April 8, 2002 Condor representatives re-surveyed the monitoring wells at the site using traditional <br /> and global positioning system (GPS) techniques in accordance with recent CRWQCB directives <br /> concerning UST site data to be submitted in Electronic Deliverable Format (EDF). The new survey data <br /> ' indicated potential discrepancies between the prior and current elevation data, particularly associated <br /> with MW-5. The top of casing elevations measured for MW-1,MW-2,MW-3,MW-6, MW-7, and MW-8 <br /> identified during the new survey were either 2.28 or 2.29 feet higher than measured by the prior survey <br /> ' conducted by WHF. This indicated that there is good agreement between the data from both surveys for <br /> the relative elevations of those monitor wells. However, the top of casing elevations measured during the <br /> new well survey for MW-4 and MW-5 were 2.34 and 2.52 feet higher, respectively, than the top of casing <br /> ' elevations measured during the prior survey. It is therefore possible, for MW-5 in particular, that the <br /> previous top of casing elevation was measured to be approximately 0.23 feet too low relative to the other <br /> site monitor well top of casing elevations. This may have occurred during the re-survey of the well on <br /> April 25, 2000 following repairs to the well as reported by WHF in previous quarterly monitoring <br /> reports. <br /> 1 <br />