Laserfiche WebLink
PAR-Eckert Cold Storage, Manteca,CA <br /> November 25, 2002 <br /> Page 4 <br /> . groundwater. The two CPT boring pairs were advanced in two locations to a depth sufficient to <br /> adequately evaluate the vertical extent of groundwater contamination in the vicinity of the former USTs <br /> and at the anticipated leading down-gradient edge of the plume. At each deep boring pair location, the <br /> first boring was advanced to provide a near-continuous log of the subsurface soil profile. The second <br /> boring at each pair location was advanced proximal to the first boring to collect a discrete groundwater <br /> sample from saturated horizons identified in geologic logs from the first borings. The boreholes were <br /> drilled by Gregg In Situ, Inc. of Martinez, California. A detailed presentation of the cone penetration test <br /> data and field equipment and procedures is provided in Appendix C. <br /> 4.2.1 Shallow direct push(hydropunch) boring procedures <br /> Ten shallow direct push borings (hydropunch) were advanced to a depth sufficient to collect a <br /> ' groundwater grab sample to provide data on the lateral extent of contamination in shallow groundwater. <br /> The first borehole (HP-1) was advanced to a depth of approximately 27 feet bgs, eight of the ten borings <br /> (HP-2 through HP-9) were advanced to a depth of approximately 25 feet bgs, and final borehole (HP-10) <br /> was advanced to a depth of approximately 30 feet bgs. One groundwater sample was collected from each <br /> direct push boring for a total of ten groundwater samples collected during the shallow groundwater <br /> investigation. <br /> The direct push borings were hydraulically advanced using a 2-inch diameter conical bit. The bit and <br /> associated push rods, the groundwater sampler, and the stainless steel bailer were steam-cleaned before <br /> each use. Each boring was grouted to the surface with neat cement upon completion of the boring and <br /> sampling. The cement was tremied into each borehole to avoid bridging. <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from the bottom of borings HP-1 through HP-10 using a <br /> Hydropunch® type groundwater sampling system. Groundwater samples were collected from depths <br />�11 ranging from 21 to 30 feet bgs, depending on the depth that each boring was terminated. The <br /> groundwater sampler operates by pushing 1.75-inch diameter hollow rods with a retrievable tip. A <br /> stainless steel filter screen is attached to the tip. At the desired sampling depth, the rods are retracted <br /> exposing the filter screen and allowing for groundwater infiltration. A small diameter bailer is then used <br /> to collect groundwater samples through the hollow rod. <br /> Each groundwater sample was gently poured from the bailer into six 40-m1 glass, volatile organic <br /> analysis (VOA) vials. The sample containers were sealed, labeled,placed in a cooler chilled with ice, and <br /> 1 delivered under chain-of-custody procedures to a California certified laboratory for analyses. The <br /> groundwater samples were analyzed using U.S. EPA Methods and California-approved methods <br /> following quality assurance measures. The laboratory analytical methods are described in Section 6.0. <br /> 4.2.2 CPT boring procedures <br /> Cone-penetrometer (CPT) borings were advanced at two locations; CPT-1 was advanced to a depth of <br /> approximately 104 feet bgs, CPT-2 was advanced to a depth of approximately 100 feet bgs. CPT-I was <br /> advanced to evaluate the vertical extent of groundwater contamination in the vicinity of the former USTs. <br /> CPT-2 was advanced to evaluate the vertical extent of groundwater contamination at the anticipated <br /> leading down-gradient edge of the plume. <br /> At each deep boring pair location, the first boring of each group was used to investigate the lithology of <br /> the site at that location. An electric piezocone was pushed downward into the subsurface by the CPT rig. <br /> • Measurements of the cone bearing pressure, sleeve friction, and dynamic pore water pressure were <br /> recorded at approximately two-inch intervals to provide a nearly continuous geologic log. The two <br /> geologic logs were compared and correlated to identify potential horizons that are laterally extensive and <br /> is CONDOR <br />