Laserfiche WebLink
M J <br /> f <br /> r <br />' 23 May 2006 <br /> AGE-NC-99-0570 <br />' Page 3 of 4 <br /> event, the top of the ground water table occurred within the screened intervals of the wells <br /> I <br /> Ground water at the site was Inferred to be flowing north-northwest under a significant hydraulic <br /> gradient of approximately 0 023 foot/foot(ft/ft) The ground water elevation contours are depicted <br /> on Figure 3 <br />' 32 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> t <br />' TPH-g was detected in the ground water samples collected from wells MW-1 and MW-2 at <br /> concentrations of 2,600 micrograms per liter(µg/1) and 900 µg/1, respectively <br />' BTEX compounds were detected in well MW-1 at concentrations of 6 0 µg/1 benzene, 57 µg/1 <br /> ethylbenzene,and 66µg/l xylenes Toluene was not detected this quarter from the samples collected <br /> MTBE was detected in well MW-1 at a concentration of 19 µg/l <br />' No other target analytes were detected at or above laboratory reporting limits in any of the samples <br /> analyzed Laboratory results of ground water samples are summarized In Table 2 The laboratory <br />' • ' reports(CTEL Project No CT214-0602042),quality assurance/quality control(QA/QC)reports,and <br /> chain of custody forms are included in Appendix C Documents confirming the upload of laboratory <br /> electronic deliverable format (EDF) files and depth to water measurements to GeoTracker are <br />' Included in Appendix D <br />' 4.0.- SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br />' Based on the results of the February 2006 monitoring event,AGE draws the following conclusions <br /> • During the February 2006 ground water monitoring event,the relative ground water elevation <br />' ranged from 6 82 feet below MSL to 9 65 feet below MSL The average ground water <br /> elevation was 8 10 feet below MSL, indicating an increase of approximately 147 feet <br /> compared to the November 2005 monitoring event <br /> • Ground water at the site was Inferred to be flowing north-northwest under a significant r <br /> hydraulic gradient of approximately 0 023 ft/ft This flow direction and gradient is similar <br /> to previous monitoring events <br /> • TPH-g was detected in the ground water samples collected from wells MW-1 and MW-2 at <br /> concentrations of 2,600 µg/l and 900 µg11, respectively TPH-d was not detected in any of <br /> the samples analyzed <br /> • BTEX compounds were detected in well MW-1 at concentrations of 6 0 µg/1 benzene, <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmentai,Inc <br />