My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
1815
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518241
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2020 3:45:08 PM
Creation date
3/23/2020 3:39:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0518241
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0013775
FACILITY_NAME
SILGAN CONTAINERS MFG CORP
STREET_NUMBER
1815
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16330006
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1815 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
California Regienal Water Quality Con*rol Board <br /> 'NoCentral Valley Region NEW <br /> Terry Tamminen Robert Schneider,Chair Arnold Schwarzenegger <br /> Secretary for Governor <br /> Environmental 11020 Sun Center Drive#200 Rancho Cordova,CA 95670-6114(916)464-3291 <br /> Protection http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwgcb5 <br /> TO: Brian Newman/'. <br /> Senior Water Resources Control Engineer <br /> Gordon Boggs <br /> UST Program Manager <br /> FROM: James Barton <br /> Engineering Geologist <br /> DATE: 22 MARCH 2004 <br /> SUBJECT: REVIEW OF NO FURTHER ACTION REQUEST, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK, <br /> SILGAN CONTAINER CORPORATION, 1815 NAVY DRIVE, STOCKTON, <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Background: Silgan Container Corporation(Silgan), formerly Canaco, a division of Carnation Can, <br /> 1815 Navy Drive, Stockton (Figure 1), owned and operated one 3,500-gallon concrete paint thinner(solvent) <br /> underground storage tank(UST). The UST(Figure 2)was reported removed in October 1986 as witnessed by <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division (SJCEHD). The seals between the concrete slabs may have <br /> deteriorated,resulting in a release of chlorinated solvents and waste petroleum hydrocarbons. Chemical odors <br /> were reported from approximately 20 cubic yards of soil were removed with the UST. The contaminated soil was <br /> aerated onsite and placed into the UST excavation. Analysis of the residue sludge from the tank revealed <br /> tetrachloroethene (PCE, 59,000 gg/L),trichloroethylene(TCE, 2,000 µg/L) and ethylbenzene(20,000 µg/L). <br /> Maximum analytical results from soil and grab groundwater investigations conducted from July to October 1987 <br /> are included as Table 1. <br /> Three monitoring wells (MW-1,PW-1, and PW-2) were installed in July 1987. The 1987 groundwater monitoring <br /> results are included as Table 2. Depth to first water is approximately 18 feet below ground surface. Shallow <br /> groundwater flow direction varies across the site, from southeast to southwest(south of UST)and northeast(east <br /> of UST),with a gradient from .002 to .006 feet/feet. Soils beneath the site consist of sand, silt, and clay to 35 feet <br /> below ground surface, the total depth of the investigations. <br /> The Phase II Site Characterization—P.A.R (PAR), dated 13 March 1990,included the January-February 1990 <br /> installation and sampling of three additional monitoring wells (GW-1, GW-2, and GW-3). Results of the soil and -- <br /> groundwater investigation are included in Table 3. The PAR stated approximately 450 cubic yards of <br /> contaminated soil existed as backfill in the UST excavation. The PAR proposed remedial alternatives were soil <br /> over-excavation and offsite transport, soil excavation and onsite biotreatment, soil vapor extraction (SVE), and no <br /> action. SVE was the preferred alternative. The PAR was never implemented, and no additional groundwater <br /> monitoring or investigations were conducted from 1991 to 2001. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> Qd Recycled Paper <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.