My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2041
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009006
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2020 5:13:06 PM
Creation date
3/25/2020 4:52:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0009006
PE
2954
FACILITY_ID
FA0004563
FACILITY_NAME
LIKA CORP
STREET_NUMBER
2041
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
16331008
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2041 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
343
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> i <br /> i <br /> l <br /> To properly decommission a well, borehole, or lost drive casing in 4 <br /> an open borehole, several considerations and complementing <br /> technical criteria should be addressed. It is important to note <br /> that each well decommissioning should be approached as a unique <br /> situation on a site-specific and case-specific basis. Also, <br /> techniques used to decommission wells with extensive filter packs <br /> are usually always time consuming and expensive if adequate results <br /> are to be achieved. Decommissioning these types of wells can cost <br /> more than the well originally cost to install. In addition, wells <br /> with extensive filter packs are usually more subject to encounter ! <br /> field problems during the physical decommissioning process because i <br /> the complexity of activities is always greater and more iterative. <br /> A sampling of the most important criteria that need to be the focus <br /> of decommissioning efforts are discussed in this paper. However, <br /> it is noted that it is not possible to provide a complete listing <br /> of all techniques and technical considerations that could be used <br /> in decommissioning activities. <br /> SUMMARY OF DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES <br /> Overview <br /> Without exception, the best technique for decommissioning a well is <br /> to remove all well construction materials by over-drilling to <br /> create a slightly larger borehole than previously existed. The <br /> newly created borehole should then be sealed with impermeable <br /> grouting material to ground surface. During initial planning to <br /> decommission a well, over-drilling may seem impractical, too <br /> expensive, and technically unwarranted. However, the integrity of <br /> this procedure to unquestionably prevent future cross contamination <br /> of water-bearing zones may provide justification for the technique. <br /> Also, if unforseen technical difficulties are considered, which <br /> almost always occur and generate increased and unbudgeted costs, <br /> over-drilling should not be automatically dismissed as an <br /> unjustifiable technique. <br /> If well construction materials are not removed by over-drilling, <br /> there are two important considerations for adequately <br /> decommissioning a well: 1) define subsurface geology penetrated by <br /> the well; and, 2) define well construction specifications. Of <br /> these, subsurface geology is probably the most important criteria. <br /> Available geologic logs of borehole lithology and construction <br /> specifications should be thoroughly reviewed. Sources of geologic <br /> logs and construction diagrams include the California Department of <br /> Water Resources (DWR) , county and city governments, and local <br /> drilling and consulting companies. <br /> In a sedimentary environment, essentially all emphasis of a <br /> decommissioning procedure should be placed on locating and sealing <br /> aquitards to prevent cross contamination in the subsurface. <br /> Sealing permeable geologic materials should not be the focus of <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.