SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE

Home Browse Search

STEVE SHINNERS Page 2 Site specific data shall be used whenever possible as input data. Some input parameters will not have site specific data, therefore, default values will be used that are protective of human health and the environment. These default values shall be clearly noted in the completed report. Land use issues tend to weigh heavily on the determination of cleanup levels. Commercial and industrial land uses do not require as stringent cleanup standards as would a noncommercial or nonindustrial use of land. Should future land use of this parcel change, the levels remaining in the soil must be reevaluated by PHS-EHD during the planning stages of the proposed change in land use. PHS-EHD would appreciate a time-schedule for the submittal of the draft assessment report, which will include the modeling and risk characterization results, and the Final Remedial Plan (the final report). The draft assessment report shall also satisfy the requirements of a corrective action plan pursuant to Article 11 of the California Code of Regulations, section 2725 - section 2728. Three copies of the proposed Final Remedial Plan (FRP, also referred to as a Corrective Action Plan [CAP]) should be submitted as well as an Executive Summary, which will be made available to the public for inspection and review during the 30 day public notification period. A public notice will be posted at the site informing the public of the proposed activities contained with the FRP, and a notice will be posted at the office of PHS-EHD. If you have any questions, please contact me at (209) 468-3452. Donna Heran, RENS, Director nvironm ntal ealth Division i Diane M. Hinson, REHS, Supervisor Site Mitigation Unit cc: B. Thayer, CVRWQCB D. Clendening, Woodward-Clyde Consultants W. Loskutoff, Woodward-Clyde Consultants i