My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE HISTORY
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009171
>
SITE HISTORY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 11:47:11 AM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:25:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE HISTORY
RECORD_ID
PR0009171
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004011
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON-FUEL TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
278
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Applications Note L <br /> STORAGE TANK LEAK DETECTION <br /> PRAMM 1 <br /> CORP. <br /> Problem Description ' <br /> Many above-grade storage tanks now in service were constructed 20 or <br /> more years ago - sufficient time for the mechanisms of metal corrosion and ' <br /> stress-fatigue cracking to weaken and perhaps breach the tank floors. The <br /> resultant tank floor leaks are often unnoticed by plant personnel during ' <br /> the performance of their daily routines. These leaks can be costly, both <br /> in terms of product loss and potential liability for environmental , <br /> Pollution. <br /> Until recently, techniques for tank-floor integrity testing were ' <br /> generally limited to visual inspection or still gauging. Visual ' <br /> inspections require the tank to be emptied, cleaned and carefully examined, <br /> Putting the tank out of service for weeks or more. Even then, some small <br /> leaks can be overlooked. ' <br /> Still-gauging methods are adequate for only the largest leaks. The <br /> accuracy of most tank-installed liquid level gauges is usually one-eighth <br /> inch at best. A product loss reflected by a 0.062-inch level drop for a ' <br /> 100-foot diameter tank translates to a 306 gal/day leak. If this 1/16-inch <br /> drop in product level is not discernible from the masking effects of fluid ' <br /> expansion, losses in excess of 2650 barrels annually will go undetected. <br /> At twenty dollars per barrel, this loss amounts to over $53,000 for a ' <br /> single tank. The associated liability risks of ground-water contamination <br /> could involve much greater potential costs. <br /> Acoustic-emission (AE) technology offers an economical solution to <br /> leak detection in these large-volume above-grade storage tanks as well as <br /> in pipelines, heat exchangers, valves and pressure vessels. <br /> C M 9173 Chesapeake Drive ' <br /> San Diego. California 92123 ' <br /> Telephone:(6 1 9)292-8922 0 Telex 295468 PL GS UR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.