My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE HISTORY
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009171
>
SITE HISTORY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 11:47:11 AM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:25:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE HISTORY
RECORD_ID
PR0009171
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004011
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON-FUEL TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
278
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 0 0 <br /> FARR, FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC. <br /> ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS <br /> James K.Farr,Ph.D. 3008 B- 16th West <br /> Andrew John Friedman Seattle,WA 98119 <br /> ' James E.Bruya,Ph.D. (206)285-8282 <br /> April 9, 1988 <br /> ' Fred Proby, Project Leader <br /> Time Oil Company <br /> ' 2737 West Commodore Way <br /> Seattle, WA 98199 <br /> Dear Mr. Proby: <br /> ' Enclosed are the results of the analyses of samples submitted on <br /> March 29, 1988 from your Stockton Terminal Project. <br /> I have concluded that the sample submitted for analysis is a <br /> leaded gasoline, that it most probably came from a single spill, <br /> and that it is also not more than about a year old. In addition <br /> ' to analyzing the three selected samples for organic lead content, <br /> we examined each of the samples for individual hydrocarbon ratios <br /> to determine if there was any indication of unmixed, separate <br /> ' products being present in the soil . A careful examination of <br /> some characteristic compounds has led me to the conclusion that <br /> the material submitted is either the result of a single spill, or <br /> has been mixed to the point that it is no longer distinguishable <br /> ' as separate gasolines . <br /> I am including the chromatograms that have led me to this <br /> ' conclusion, along with several other chromatograms of other <br /> gasolines, to show the degree of uniqueness that this material <br /> displays. It does not show any gradations of mixing that one <br /> ' would expect if several spills were continuously mixing in the <br /> soil . <br /> There appears to have been very little weathering of the gasoline <br /> ' found floating on the surface of the water. Extensive weathering <br /> would be expected if the gasoline and water had been in contact <br /> for an extended period of time. Also, the organic lead content <br /> t is at or below 0. 1 g/gallon, a standard introduced approximately <br /> a year ago and is down from previous levels of around 1 g/gallon. <br /> This level of organic lead is considerably above the 0 . 05 <br /> ' g/gallon limit set for unleaded gasoline products. It is <br /> possible that an older leaded gasoline would lose its organic <br /> lead content and appear to be a newer product, based solely on <br /> the lead content. However, this seems unlikely to be the case, <br /> ' since the gasoline shows very little weathering by gas <br /> chromatography. Also, the samples showing the highest degrees of <br /> weathering (loss of API gravity and lighter components) would be <br /> ' expected to show the lowest lead content which was not the case. <br /> These test results suggest that the lead content in the product <br /> has, in fact, changed very little. <br /> 1 <br /> t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.