My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2947
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009278
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 11:50:23 AM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:44:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009278
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004013
FACILITY_NAME
SFPP, LP STOCKTON TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
2947
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2947 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE QF CALIFORNIA- Environmental Proteragency • PETE WILSON, Govemar <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION •�- <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A Y <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 <br /> PHONE: (916)255-3000 <br /> FAX: (9 16) 255-3015 awn+ <br /> 22 December 1993 <br /> Mr. Steve M. Ferrara ? <br /> Santa Fe Pacific Pipeline Partners, L. P. o '- <br /> 888 South Figueroa Street C <br /> Los Angeles, CA 90017 <br /> -a <br /> ADDITIONAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT, SANTA FE PACIFIC PIPELINES, iFri <br /> STOCKTON FACILITY, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed HartCrowsers 11 November 1993 Report of Additional Site Assessment for your <br /> Stockton facility. My comments are presented below. <br /> 1. SFPP should compile all ground water elevation data and determine ground water flow directions <br /> from these data. This information will indicate if other areas of the facility need coverage in <br /> monitoring the ground water quality. Although the regional ground water flow direction is <br /> generally from the northwest to southeast, data presented in SFPP's April 1989 report entitled <br /> Ground Water Investigation and Environmental Assessment showed ground water flowed to the <br /> northeast. <br /> 2. The monitoring data and the calculation used to determine the vertical downward gradient <br /> should be included in the report. <br /> 3. The report recommends drilling additional soil borings north of the manifold/prover loop area <br /> and in the vicinity of monitoring wells M-4 and M-7, installing a ground water monitoring well <br /> upgradient of the manifold/prover loop, and preparing a remedial action plan. I concur with <br /> these recommendations. <br /> By, 14 January 1994 please respond to the above comments and submit a work plan with a time <br /> schedule to implement the recommendations presented in the report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.