Laserfiche WebLink
California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> �■/ Central Valley Region <br /> Robert Schneider, Chair <br /> Terry Tamminen Arnold Schwarzenegger <br /> Secretary for Sacramento Main Office <br /> Governor <br /> Environmental Internet Address: http://wwwswrcb.ca.gov/rwgcb5 <br /> Protection 11020 Sun Center Drive#200 Rancho Cordova,CA 95670-6114 <br /> Phone(916)464-3291 Fax(916)464-4797 <br /> 5 March 2004 RECEIVED <br /> MAR 0 9 2004 <br /> Mr. Jeff Goold <br /> Shell OPUS ENVIRONMENT HEALTH <br /> 2555 - 13th Ave SW PERWrISERVICES <br /> Seattle, WA 98134 <br /> REVIEW OF MONITORING REPORTS, SHELL OIL PRODUCTS US, BULK FUEL <br /> TERMINAL,3515 NAVY DRIVE, STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Staff of the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) has reviewed <br /> the 30 October 2003 Third Quarter Monitoring Report- 2003 (QMR) and the 30 January 2004 <br /> Combined Fourth Quarter and Annual Monitoring Report—2003 (Annual Report) submitted by <br /> The RETEC Group, Inc. on behalf of Shell Oil Products US (Shell) for the bulk fuel facility at <br /> 3515 Navy Drive in Stockton. The QMR discusses the groundwater monitoring activities <br /> conducted in August and status of the groundwater extraction and treatment system (GWETS). <br /> The Annual Report discusses the groundwater monitoring activities conducted in November, <br /> trends observed in 2003, and performance of the GWETS. <br /> We have the following comments on these reports: <br /> 1. Some of the figures in the QMR show concentrations with a"d" qualifier but the qualifier <br /> is not explained. Shell needs to provide definitions for qualifiers used in tables and <br /> figures. <br /> 2. The Annual Report refers to correspondence with the City of Stockton regarding the <br /> discharge from the GWETS. Shell needs to provide Regional Board staff with copies of <br /> this correspondence. <br /> 3. The figures in the Annual Report show a proposed well location,but the text does not <br /> discuss the proposed well location. <br /> The Annual Report proposes to evaluate alternative technologies to pollution remediation and to <br /> evaluate the need for additional delineation activities after two additional quarters of data are <br /> collected from monitoring well MW-35. Regional Board staff concurs with these <br /> recommendations. By 2 April 2004,please provide copies of the correspondence with the City <br /> of Stockton regarding the GWETS. By 16 April 2004, submit a feasibility study work plan that <br /> will outline the remedial alternatives Shell proposes to evaluate and what tests, analytical <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> Co Recycled Paper <br />