Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> EXPLANATION <br /> ^ k Groundwater elevation contour,in 1,10 <br /> MW-2 * Monitoring well location feet above mean sea level(msl) N$ l <br /> MW-1 + Groundwater extraction well location ---'Well designation <br /> DW-2 beeper monitoring well location LEV. --Groundwater elevation,in feet above msl <br /> (not used in contouring) IPHgTMd <br /> 111�rr i rW-1 Destro ed well location D TPHg,TPHd,benzene,MTBE,and TBAY MTBE concentrations are in micrograms per literOverhead electrical line(OE) Notes: 0.00 ♦ � <br /> — — — -- Electrical line(E) J=Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting r <br /> limit and above the laboratory method defection limit. Reported �� 0 <br /> Unknown utility line(?) s <br /> - — ?— - <br /> value isestimated. = <br /> SanitaryNA <br /> sewer line SAN NA=Not available or not analyzed r / 8 \* -0.05 70 } / <br /> (SAN) / NO s.7w / 0 54 ooa11 <br /> ND=Not detected / ND '`•( r4OW -0.20 <br /> — — - W— Water fine(W) NDa=Elevated reporting limit;see laboratory report for details rr -0 58 3� 440 <br /> �♦ NA /// <br /> — — — — Product piping line P N5=Not sampled / ,/.. f7 1,• <br /> P P 9 ( ) / / r, -0.23 ♦ �, ! / ♦ I <br /> * <br /> The sample chromatographic pattern for TPH does not match � � //// � b.� <br /> — Fencellne the chromatographic pattern of the specified standard. / 2so0• / <br /> Quantitation of the unknown hydrocarbon(s)in the sample was / /�� >' 48" <br /> �-- — — — Groundwater extraction based upon the specified standard. » / Q riD" sc,�6 <br /> system piping **= P P fr-�,��/ ,7 O ♦- •1.06 // , -2.0 / <br /> Analyte was present in the associated method blank• <br /> "=Sampled February 10,2010. ; I irm <br /> 13r ' .v4 7,� <br /> Nn <br /> -1,32 �� NA 1,160` 1 - A <br /> B4- Bake p 300 2.6 . j r� ~J ` -2,09 <br /> 170 / .1,10 <br /> 7.93 r r 4000 " <br /> NO ND ., 6148) '` 0.55 i,eo6^ 480" <br /> NA 40 7nyr ND. s�s�..� 8.800" 7.2" ND" / <br /> Z700. I JWA 2P <br /> 1 •2.00 /i ��` ; -9.47 r� ao f r ND" <br /> 1 r 4 2 300" r . / i <br /> y ililr/ rwW 13 /� aaa ` NDMa I i t flNs$ i <br /> i 2,12 // , a•8J �, <br /> f i Da w8r 4Ap� -�� _ <br /> fr NA i f , / ehaUs,9 7600' _ <br /> / 27{10 r! / / 2.1 <br /> �.,-4 1 `�..� / ! 73 <br /> NA /NA 811 f!Try R "8 '' / <br /> �. $.71 <br /> 160 uz.- 126,000 <br /> 2.400 <br /> -2.78 <br /> `— �— _ -4.o0 // �/ ♦ -1.34NO 02" <br /> NO C) -1:78 -,._ i W / <br /> 2RD <br /> 391 p �` y D% 1,0 - "" /i r 22 / Tosco <br /> ND ♦ x+ 3 i -2.14 ! 82 876" <br /> NNO 6,30r D i 1800' 1 �ORc 3703` � <br /> 1 IQ 4M* <br /> go 20 0.78° <br /> 1 1.800 52 $� ���, L �•\ / !r / / <br /> MW-27 X000 <br /> MM <br /> I i -3.49 -1.55 <br /> I I 1_LQ NO <br /> ► 0.80J <br /> -a:5s - ��_ - -�.__- ND __.___- --- - �' Figure 2 <br /> NO <br /> TO <br /> NN NO2W RD <br /> Groundwater Contour and Chemical Concentration Map <br /> NA �2•e5 _ February 3, 2010 <br /> -l ND 1 <br /> NO !, Shell Stockton Terminal <br /> " 3515 Navy Drive, Stockton, California <br /> 1:1Shelll6-chars12417--1241729-Stockton 3515 Navy Drive1241729-REPORTS1241729-RPT27-1&20101241729 1QM10-GW.DWG(7/26/2410) <br />