Laserfiche WebLink
E <br /> E <br /> EXPLANATION r Groundwater elevation contour,in <br /> MW-2 Monitoring well location feet above mean sea level(msl) 415 <br /> MW-1 Groundwater extraction well location Well designation NO <br /> DW-2 Deeper monitoring well location i=LEV. ---�Groundwater elevation in feet above msl /r_ NO <br /> (not used in contouring) TPH9 i - NA <br /> OW-1 X Destroyed well locationaT Hd �TPHg,TPHd,benzene, MTBE,and TBA / 466 --� _ 472 <br /> MME concentrations are in micrograms per liter / 42^1 z.' 38' <br /> — —�— overhead electrical line(OE) Notes: I y ND a:Mu w •0.$0 # <br /> IM <br /> ND -0.59 <br /> I p <br /> NO ND <br /> NO `� -< 98 <br /> — — — P— Electrical line(E) J=Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting o NA Na Nn <br /> — — — — limit and above the laboratory method detection limit: Reported "A 7e NA i 2 tv <br /> Unknown utility line(?) value is estimated, _ 1,209 NA i <br /> NA=Not available or not analyzed ! / / +B 1 00 + / <br /> Sanitary sewer line(SAN) / / r . / 140 / / 0 50 1 00ft <br /> ND=Not detected <br /> — — — V— Water line W NDa=Elevated reporting limit,see laboratory report for details / illi <br /> 'v` -0,73 �� 13 <br /> ( ) P 9 Y Po <br /> NS=Not sampled ♦. lily <br /> - — P— ProductP P g line(1 in P) *_ / ND „ -0.5a _ <br /> -The sample chromatographic pattern for TPH does not match / / 67 <br /> ND !/I/ NO 28,000^ /� I -1.59 <br /> -- --- - - 1=enceline the chromatographic pattern of the specified standard. /`. 20 lirr i% ND 5400» c'!L --r / ND <br /> Quantitation of the unknown hydrocarbon(s)in the sam le was NA /ri 'x°00 ?r�:=° ND <br /> P II - Ji7 '��.!! / ea0 �{;C ,.'- NO <br /> ra I <br /> — — - — Groundwater extraction based upon the specified standard. / / r NA <br /> system piping **W The sample chromatographic pattern for TPH matches the ir, / 4l Q .+. _9 fi7 // S6 .2.50 NA <br /> chromatographic attern of the specified standard but lighter ! ��`- O 140" <br /> hydrocarbons are also present(or were detected). / _ +3� x. <br /> P p 9 i »1.63 NA N0* <br /> ^=Analyte was present in the associated method blank. ?so I e �.T �- ! �� 10 0 ,� j 72 ` -2,60 <br /> NO NO -1.78 <br /> t / NA 9.IJ /` NO ss�� �` 8.600 r 180 <br /> �* j _��` 3.300' 1 160 // 20 J; <br /> -2.07 . ,y s90 ND •1,62 <br /> 'e NO NO i,v` 8.8J r�l / <br /> 230 .72 �.. "r�w.17 <br /> -'1 �f l NO / <br /> E J i 11 lJ��r 8.9 1.200" NA <br /> i -3,17 // NA i ///, 133 840 •1.61 NA I <br /> 1,100• / I 3,100" 1 l� ! i 0.81 %0DO <br /> !` 810" i / _ i 10 house 4,200" �`� �`.? // ! <br /> W I 1 J 170 r 190 1 r I / i 4.1 J 23 35 ,' <br /> } `i- J NA 390 � rFT�d:Loadng E! / 17 �y-10 f /' <br /> 1 !` NA 3,000 i / lid r7 ! 38 / 1 n P&M.RWV <br /> L J •5.02 f/ ! i ! , ! NO % <br /> 28000" �� e ,r ! !ir NO j <br /> WI 4 / 1209• �� -2.33 <br /> 2.400 /' ` -2.5fi 800 J �:, NA /• <br /> .4�g 1` tk `/-� 14.00°09 �J-4.00 21700• f °� <br /> NO 1 t ��� �_ ' 4,500 / 34 850 / <br /> O S -- J I00 39 620. ! <br /> o.30J 1 �`'��= ` NDa '/'��`� NO <br /> 1 rr <br /> 29 ND11 4 NA ! <br /> NO Lss t ,• ��a M-1 % TOSCa <br /> 36 �r f <br /> NONo '] t -3.41 I <br /> ND iNO <br /> 45 140 <br /> 32 <br /> 38 <br /> I I 1 <br /> I i EM <br /> Has -3.26 <br /> T ND <br /> 61 1 <br /> _ Figure 2 <br /> 1E0' 81 � <br /> NO <br /> x.77 1.3 <br /> _ I- y-W- NO 61 Groundwater Contour and <br /> NO t =^�T W - -`W_T�_ ----__-__.._ Chemical Concentration Map <br /> NO �r_y_ aoNA <br /> _________-__. August 30-31, 2010 <br /> NA <br /> -4.18 '. ' ; Shell Stockton Terminal <br /> !" NA ND C. l <br /> ND , 3515 Navy Drive <br /> - . --- _ NA — ----- Stockton, California <br /> 1:\She1116-chars\2417--1241729-Stockton 3515 Navy Drive\241729-REPORTS1241729-RPT28-3Q10&4Q101241729 3QM10-GW.DWG(01126/2011) <br />