Laserfiche WebLink
IT Corporation <br /> 4005 Pore ChWd o 1h htti iv <br /> Concord, CA 94520 1120 <br /> Tel 925 288 9898 <br /> 'ihe(90;groupI dx 925 288 0888 <br /> zI A1cmjbf r of 1hf 11 f roup <br /> �p-4 <br /> May 3, 2001 <br /> Mr Harlin K09, R E H S <br /> $slq quimCounty Public Health Services <br /> vH;r�yy�e]fn�t/ai Health Division <br /> Stockton, California 95201 <br /> T t'" Sublect,�r - Site Assessment and Request for Closure <br /> r Sears Auto Center No 1288 <br /> 5110 Pacific Avenue <br /> Stockton, California <br /> Dear Mr Knoll <br /> On behalf of Sears, Roebuck and Co (Sears),IT Corporation (IT) is responding to agency <br /> 'rs <br /> comments regarding the Site Assessment >aiikRequest for Closure document dated <br /> February 10, 2000, for Sears Auto Center No 1288 located at 5110 Pacific Avenue, Stockton, <br /> California <br /> As per our telephope discussion on April 19, 2001, it is understood that there is a question <br /> regarding the anplytical results associated with soil samples collected at the subject site in August <br /> 1994 during fuel dispenser and product line removal activities The soil Anel�ytir,.pl results in <br /> question are listed in Section III of the Underground Storage T ilk as r►p Review Fort dated <br /> October 1, 1998, which is found in Attachment 3 of Appendix C lathe Site Assessment and <br /> Request for Closure document (a copy of the form Is also,attarhed to this correspondence) The <br /> analytical results listed in Section III of the review form are intended to be the "Maximum <br /> Documented Contaminant Concentrations"for soil samples collected in'August 1994 during fuel <br /> axe <br /> d#spenscr} l product line removal activities, and were taken from'Tppl�§,�, ?4od 3 found in <br /> . Appendix C %t4q.Site Assessment and Request for Closurp109,qum91&tT* til analytical <br /> results shown on t review form list total petroleum hydrocarbons 4§gq#ll1pq,(THP-g) at a <br /> maximum concentration of 4,800 lr'tliligrditffilboram (mg/kg) As I mentiooed during our <br /> discussion on April 19, 2001, this TPH-g result is in error <br /> Tables 1, 2 and 3 (Appendix C, Site Assessm 60efi�Bequest for ClosgsI,gocgment) summarize <br /> the soil analytical data from the GTEL Environm64all C boratop% Inc,y(PTE�.�,rLeports (also <br /> found in Appendix C) Both the tables and the G' 6 ie'o, s thatrIc 1R n�+tf��Tables, indicate <br /> that the soil samples collectgd during fuel dispehi er aM pfoQt iiIng,romoval activities in August <br /> 1994 contained a maxinaafrx $T1PH-g concentration;i bf only bmg/fig, Therefore, the TPH-g <br /> concentration of 4,800 mg/kg listed on the review foram is in error <br /> skr C 1WINDOWSOESKTQP5042301 dog <br />