Laserfiche WebLink
MLEEDSHILL•HENKENHOFF. INC. <br /> To determine if there was a continuing source of PCE/TCE in water conveyed <br /> ' by the sewer system, sewer samples were collected from six distinct sewer <br /> lines. As with the sewer soil samples, the water samples were collected <br /> from the three sewer laterals serving each of the dry-cleaning establish- <br /> ments. An attempt was also made to collect a sample of sewage inflow onto <br /> Lincoln Village Center from Lincoln Elementary School , which is located just <br /> ' north of Lincoln Village Center. This sample could not be obtained because <br /> there was essentially no flow from the school at the time of this investiga- <br /> tion. Figure 3.3 shows which manholes were sampled. <br /> All samples were sealed immediately after being collected, then they were <br /> labeled, cooled and transported to the laboratory under appropriate chain- <br /> of-custody procedures in accordance with standard EPA protocol . The soil <br /> samples were analyzed for purgeable halogenated volatile organics (EPA <br /> ' Method No. 8010) and the water samples were analyzed for purgeable halocar- <br /> bons (EPA Method' No. 601) . The analytical methods used conform to either <br /> EPA Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes (SW-846) , EPA Test Methods for <br /> ' Organic Chemical Analysis of Municioal and Industrial Wastewater, or Stan- <br /> dard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, and was performed by a <br /> certified DOHS hazardous waste analytical laboratory, APPL, Inc. (Certifica- <br /> tion No. 126) . <br /> A quality assurance-quality control program was undertaken by field person- <br /> nel and the laboratory to ensure the highest degree of accuracy and repro- <br /> ducibility of the analytical results. To evaluate the potential for outside <br /> ' contamination due to field procedures or laboratory contamination, a travel <br /> blank was carried during the field work and was transported and analyzed <br /> identically to the field samples. To evaluate reproducibility of the <br /> results, APPL laboratories analyzed 10% of the samples in duplicate. All <br /> sample collection was done under the supervision of a registered civil <br /> engineer. <br /> A Health and Safety program was enacted before and during the field work <br /> portion of this investigation. A pre-sampling safety meeting was held for <br /> all on-site personnel which detailed field crew responsibilities, safety and <br /> emergency procedures and effects from varying exposure levels of PCE and <br /> TCE. Appropriate field gear including Tyvek coveralls, double-lined gloves, <br /> booties and half-mask respirators, were on hand for all workers in case <br /> TCE/PCE levels became significant. An HNU photo ionization detector was <br /> 3-6 <br />