Laserfiche WebLink
(effectively containing the groundwater plume on-site and preventing or reducing future migration <br /> of contaminants) and expose hydrocarbon -impacted soil to vapor extraction The relatively high <br /> yield of groundwater extraction (approximately 4 gpm maximum sustainable yield with a radius of <br /> influence in excess of 100 feet) will result in the ability to capture and remediate larger volumes of <br /> water over a relatively short period of time (three years) <br />' 7.1 Soil Vapor Extraction <br /> 7 1 1 Summary of Major Components for VES <br /> The extraction wells are connected to header lines which, in turn, are connected to a blower/thermal <br /> oxidizer system with the ability to change over to catalytic oxidation as soil vapor concentrations drop <br /> below 3,500 ppmv (equivalent to approximately 25% of the LEL) Soil vapor extraction testing <br /> performed by Alton in June 1995 detected average soil vapor concentrations of approximately <br />' 5,000 ppmv, indicating that a thermal oxidizer system capable of handling higher concentrations of <br /> influent soil vapor(assuming no dilution air) is necessary for the Site <br /> A vacuum is applied by the treatment unit blower to the header lines Soil vapor is then extracted by <br /> the blower from the area around each well through the perforations in the well pipe (negative <br /> pressure) Such treatment units are designed for soil vapor extraction and groundwater remediation <br /> 1 projects and other VOC destruction applications where combustion of the volatiles has been specified <br /> as the most cost-effective method These units operate automatically The proposed treatment unit <br /> for this Site has been designed to run on supplemental fuel (natural gas or propane) <br /> As remediation proceeds at the Site, and as concentrations in the process gas begin to decline, it may <br /> become more cost effective to utilize an alternative treatment technology such as activated carbon <br /> adsorption The decision to change the off-gas treatment system will be based on the results of the <br /> on-gomg monitoring program It is anticipated that when hydrocarbon concentrations in the process <br /> gas begin to approach 500 ppmv, an alternate off-gas treatment technology (such as carbon filtration) <br /> can be considered <br /> Changes in system operation will be formally addressed with the San Joaquin Valley APCD prior to <br /> i modification <br /> 7.1 2 Well Installation Spacing <br /> Alton's extraction feasibility testing of the extraction well VW-3 (screened interval of 21 to 36 feet <br />' bgs) indicated that there was a vacuum response in the upper vadose zone's screened intervals of <br /> adjacent monitoring wells (near or at 0 1 inches of water column) approximately 33 feet from the <br /> extraction well Vapor extraction well radii of influence are indicated on Figure 16 <br /> A.11528J1 ASA 18 <br />