Laserfiche WebLink
page 2, 6100 N. Hwy 99 <br /> The monitoring wells were developed and sampled on June 16, 2000. Results of the analyses of <br /> the collected samples indicate that groundwater beneath this site has been impacted by <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons and fuel oxygenating compounds. All four monitoring wells had total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons as gas, benzene and MtBE at maximum quantities of 8,910 micrograms <br /> per liter(µgh), 2,310 µg/I and 3,200 pg/l, respectively. In addition, MW4 had tertiary butyl alcohol <br /> at 807 µg/I, tertiary amyl methyl ether at 4.48 pg/I and 1,2-dichloroethane at 84.4 µg/I. MW-2 and <br /> MW-3 had 1,2-dichloroethane at 38.8 µg/1 and 70.2 µg/I respectively. <br /> Routine quarterly groundwater monitoring must be initiated at this site, and must continue until <br /> directed otherwise from PHS/EHD. PHS/EHD has not approved the use of a no-purge method of <br /> groundwater sampling at this site. Both the California State Water Resources Control Board, as <br /> referenced in the Leaking Underground Fuel Tank (LUFT) Field Manual, and the United States <br /> Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) recommend that monitoring wells are purged until a <br /> minimum of three well volumes are removed, or until measured parameters of pH, temperature <br /> and conductivity of the discharged water stabilize to +/- 10% over two successive well volumes. <br /> There is a domestic well on the property that is used to provide water to the business on site. <br /> This well is located approximately 15 feet from MW-3. This domestic well must be sampled and <br /> analyzed for petroleum hydrocarbons and fuel oxygenates as soon as possible, and should be <br /> placed on the routine quarterly monitoring schedule. Analysis for all oxygenates, 1,2- <br /> dichloroethane and ethylene dibromide must be completed by EPA Method 8260. <br /> SECOR included in this"Site Assessment Report"a well survey covering a half mile radius area <br /> surrounding the subject site. The submitted survey documented only five wells within the search <br /> area, and noted that none of these wells are municipal wells. This well survey is very incomplete. <br /> There is no public water distribution to areas along the Highway 99 East Frontage Road. All <br /> occupied parcels along this corridor and to the east of this area, the subject site included, are <br /> supplied by private domestic or agricultural wells. Some of these wells may be very old, and <br /> records or permits are not available for them. A physical search of the target area must be <br /> conducted to locate all domestic, municipal, agricultural, industrial or other wells that may be <br /> influencing, or influenced by, the subject site's contaminant plume. <br /> Reports of findings are due to PHS/EHD within 60 days following the completion of each phase of <br /> work at a site. The above referenced report was overdue. Please have your reports submitted to <br /> PHS/EHD in a timely manner in the future. <br /> Prepare a work plan to continue the investigation of the vertical and lateral extent of the <br /> documented contamination at this site and submit it to PHS/EHD by December 1, 2000. Depth <br /> discrete samples will be required to define the vertical extent of the contaminant plume at depths <br /> below the screen intervals of the current onsite monitoring wells. Deep, discretely screen <br /> monitoring wells will be required. The lateral extent of the contaminant plume should be <br /> determined as soon as possible, and, if MtBE is found to be migrating off site, measures should <br /> be taken to contain the plume. If you have any questions call Lori Duncan at(209)468-0337. <br /> Donna Heran, REHS, Director <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> cc-tA a <br /> Lori Duncan, Senior REHS Dot Lofstrom, RG <br /> LOP/Site Mitigation Unit IV Engineering Geologist <br /> cc: Marty Hartzell, CVRWOCB <br /> Rusty Benkosky, SECOR <br />