My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
O
>
120 (STATE ROUTE 120)
>
21801
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516259
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 4:01:48 PM
Creation date
4/1/2020 3:39:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0516259
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0012534
FACILITY_NAME
BARREL TEN QUARTER CIRCLE LAND CO
STREET_NUMBER
21801
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 120
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320
APN
20525002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
21801 E HWY 120
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Modeling Guidelines Page 2 <br /> 7. What are the critical conditions that you are trying to model'?Flow?Temperattire?pH? Critical <br /> conditions may be combinations of conditions;for several parameters that occur at the same time, <br /> e.g. simultaneous low flow and low hardness.,Explain why these are critical conditions. Where <br /> parameters are not independent, explain and justify the assumed relations. <br /> 8. What is the model's performance objective or target? An example is: "Reproduce total nitrogen <br /> and total phosph orus concentrations within t 25% for 90% of'observed data within the <br /> calibration and validation periods." [Surface Water Quality Modeling: An Introduction, May <br /> 2002, pg 15,] <br /> 9. I low will model performance be demonstrated,and what efforts will be taken to improve the <br /> model's accuracy? Model performance may be improved through calibration and validation to <br /> reduce model uncertainty, and a sensitivity analysis can provide insight into the model <br /> uncertainty. <br /> a. How will the model be calibrated and validated? Calibration is the process of selecting <br /> model parameters to"fit"the model to the physical world that it simulates. Validation is <br /> the process of testing the model with the selected parameters to show that it simulates an <br /> independent data set. Calibration and validation information that should be Provided <br /> include: (1) identification of the empirical data used, (2)discussion of the physical <br /> constants or other model variables that were modified or adjusted and why, (3) the <br /> procedures that were used to improve model accuracy, and (4) the results of calibration <br /> and validation. <br /> h. A sensitivity analysis evaluates whether a change in a model parameter results in either a <br /> relatively small change in a water quality response or a relatively large change in water <br /> quality response. It is typically performed by varying one calibration parameter or one <br /> model input at a time, usually by a fixed percentage, through an accepted range of values. <br /> A sensitivity analysis can identity the parameters that may be significant contributors to <br /> uncertainty in the model predictions. These parameters may then be further developed to <br /> reduce the uncertainty. The extent of sensitivity analysis that will be completed. <br /> including the parameters that will be analyzed, and the basis for selecting those <br /> parameters should be agreed upon prior to conducting the analysis. <br /> C. I low will the model uncertainty be quantified'I Model uncertainty describes how close <br /> the model results are to reality,and can be expressed as bias, precision, error, or as the <br /> margin of safety in the results. 'there should be agreement with Regional Board staff <br /> regarding the acceptable level of unceetainty in the model results. The quantification of <br /> uncertainty typically comes from the calibration, validation, and sensitivity analyses. <br /> There should be a goal to minimize the model uncertainty to a certain value if the model <br /> is being used to predict exact water quality constituent concentrations. I lowever, if the <br /> model is being used to rank best and worst alternatives, the accuracy of the model may <br /> not be as important if the error in the model results is the same for each alternative. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.