Laserfiche WebLink
Mr.James L. Barton <br /> August 31, 2009 <br /> Page 2 <br /> removal rates have been below one ppd for four of the past six months (March 2009 through August <br /> 2009), with a maximum removal rate in this time period of 1.6 ppd. The low mass removal rates <br /> correspond with decreased dissolved phase hydrocarbons in the groundwater at the Site. With <br /> groundwater hydrocarbons being non-detect in the area that is being sparged, continued air sparging is no <br /> longer warranted. <br /> Dissolved Groundwater Concentration Trends <br /> Prior to the July 31, 2008 startup of the upgraded AS/SVE system, several monitoring wells located in <br /> proximity to former source areas (Figure 2) (MW-2, MW-3, MW-81D, MW-11) had concentrations of TPHg <br /> and benzene above cleanup objectives. In response to the upgraded AS/SVE system operation, dissolved <br /> concentrations of TPHg and benzene have decreased to below the laboratory detection limits of 50 <br /> micrograms per liter(µg/L)for TPHg and 0.5 µg/L for benzene in all four of these wells. Concentration <br /> trend plots for MW-2, MW-3, MW-8D, and MW-11 are included as Figures 4 through 7. Concentration <br /> data trends comparing current data to April 2008 pre-upgrade data are summarized below: <br /> • MW-2—TPHg concentration in the third quarter 2009 is below the 50 µg/L detection limit for the <br /> first time since 2001. Benzene has been below the detection limit of 0.5 µg/L for two consecutive <br /> quarters (2Q09 and 3Q09). In April of 2008, TPHg and benzene concentrations were 15,000 µg/L <br /> and 350 µg/L, respectively. <br /> • MW-3—TPHg and benzene concentrations have been below the detection limits of 50 µg/L and <br /> 0.5 µg/L, respectively, for two consecutive quarters (2Q09 and 3Q09). In April 2008,TPHg and <br /> benzene concentrations were 32,000 µg/L and 4,500µg/L, respectively. <br /> • MW-8D—TPHg has been below the detection limit of 50 µg/L for three consecutive quarters <br /> (1 Q09 through 3Q09). Benzene has not been detected for five consecutive quarters (3Q08 <br /> through 3Q09). In the fourth quarter 2008, benzene was non-detect at an elevated reporting limit <br /> of 5 µg/L. In April 2008,TPHg and benzene concentrations were 7,300 ug/L and 1,800 µg/L, <br /> respectively. <br /> • MW-11 —TPHg and benzene concentrations have been below the detection limits of 50 Itg/L and <br /> 0.5 µg/L, respectively for four consecutive quarters (4Q08 and 3009). In April 2008, TPHg and <br /> benzene concentrations were 5,200 µg/L and 1,300 µg/L, respectively. <br /> Recommendation <br /> Based on the low influent concentrations and mass removal rates currently achieved by the AS/SVE <br /> remediation system, coupled with the non-detect dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations observed in recent <br /> groundwater monitoring, AECOM recommends shutting down the AS/SVE remediation system for rebound <br /> testing at this time. <br /> The proposed rebound test is outlined below: <br /> • With approval from the CVWB, shut the system down to allow the subsurface environment time to <br /> reach an equilibrium state. <br /> • Following a 6-week shutdown, sample groundwater monitoring wells MW-2, MW-3, MW-8D, and <br /> MW-11 and analyze for TPHg by EPA Method 8015 and benzene,toluene, ethylbenzene, and <br /> total xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 8260. <br /> • If 'significant' rebound is not observed in the monitoring wells, leave the system shutdown for an <br /> extended rebound period extending into the first quarter of 2010 to allow collection of the First <br /> Quarter 2010 groundwater monitoring event samples and evaluation of data for rebound. For the <br /> purposes of this test, `significant' rebound is defined as 10%of pre-startup TPHg and benzene <br /> AECOM Environment I AECOM <br />