My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_REPORT ON SOIL VAPOR SAMPLING AND HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT DEC 2010
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5400
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522692
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_REPORT ON SOIL VAPOR SAMPLING AND HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT DEC 2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2020 4:46:55 PM
Creation date
4/2/2020 2:39:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
REPORT ON SOIL VAPOR SAMPLING AND HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT DEC 2010
RECORD_ID
PR0522692
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015465
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER MONTGOMERY WARDS AUTO SRV CTR
STREET_NUMBER
5400
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
10227008
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
5400 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AECOM Report on Soil Vapor Sampling and Human Health Risk Assessment 2-8 <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons of a group (like gasoline)are not the only chemical compounds that elute <br /> from a chromatograph within the retention time window assigned for each group and, as such,TPI-Ig <br /> values can be misleading with regard to vapor toxicity. <br /> The three most abundant of the identified C8 compounds are tetramethylbutane; 2,3,4- <br /> trimethylpentane; and 2,3,3-trimethylpentane.Their relative abundance in each of the samples <br /> collected is displayed in the attached chromatograms (Figure 4—May event, Figure 5—September <br /> event, and Figure 7—October event). On each of these figures, the chromatogram for the sample <br /> event is compared to that of a gasoline reference standard. Internal standard compounds (which are <br /> added by the laboratory for quality control)are marked in yellow and are at constant concentrations, <br /> while the measured components vary. It can be clearly seen in each comparison that the principal <br /> components (labeled in red as"1, 2, and 3") in each of the samples are not the principal components <br /> of gasoline. These chromatograms also confirm that three of the primary aromatic components of <br /> gasoline (toluene , ortho-xylene, and meta-¶-xylenes[benzene and ethylbenzene were not used <br /> in the comparison])are not present in the Samples. Therefore,while the May, September, and <br /> October samples have substantial quantities of material that elute within the time window defined for <br /> TPHg,that material is now clearly different from gasoline in its chemical composition. <br /> The potential health risks presented by the chemicals detected in the vapor samples are evaluated <br /> based on the detailed chemical composition data obtained. DTSC vapor intrusion guidance for TPH <br /> recommends the use of six groups of hydrocarbons for which chemical surrogates for toxicity have <br /> been selected (DTSC, 2009). [Although this guidance has recently been withdrawn, it is particularly <br /> relevant to this site.]These groups separate hydrocarbons into categories for aliphatics and aromatics <br /> in different carbon atom content ranges. Based on these categories,the composition observed at SV- <br /> 1 (during all three events)is in two groups: C5-C8 aliphatics and C9-C18 aliphatics,which are further <br /> discussed in Section 3.0,below. <br /> Based on the superior quality control performance (e.g., vacuum 510 inches Hg and helium analysis <br /> indicating no leaks)in the October sampling, data from that sampling event was carried forward into <br /> the indoor vapor intrusion risk analysis. Additionally, in order to exhaustively calculate potential risks, <br /> we further evaluated data(TICS and chromatograms)from the May and September events as part of <br /> a conservative uncertainty assessment, despite known data quality deficiencies associated with those <br /> data sets. The quantities of analytes detected as TICS (in the May and September data sets)were <br /> classified by their respective carbon chain lengths, and the totals for each chain length category(i.e., <br /> C5-C8)were then used in risk analysis, as discussed in Section 3.0, below. <br /> December 15,2010 <br /> 60146576-M10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.