My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012537
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5400
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522692
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012537
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2020 4:54:59 PM
Creation date
4/2/2020 4:21:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012537
RECORD_ID
PR0522692
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015465
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER MONTGOMERY WARDS AUTO SRV CTR
STREET_NUMBER
5400
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
10227008
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
5400 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN DELTA COLLEGE <br /> performed for only part of a day, the time during which the vapor is being released is used to determine the rate of <br /> contaminant generation <br /> Effect of Distribution and Make-up Air One of the most important factors in the design of dilution ventilation, and the one <br /> most frequently overlooked, is the need to supply sufficient and properly directed make-up air to replace the air exhausted <br /> Ideally, the make-up air will be positively introduced and distributed in such a manner that the source of contaminant is <br /> situated between the worker and the exhaust outlet,the exhaust is located as close as possible to the source of contammation, <br /> all the air will pass through the zone of contamination,and the contaminant will be diluted to the design levels as soon as it is <br /> generated Under such conditions, the K factor in the formula could be 1, since no factor of safety would be required <br /> However,ideal distribution conditions can never be assumed and actual conditions will vary considerably <br /> Average conditions may be assumed to be those where the toxicity of the contaminant is moderate,the exhaust fan or fans are <br /> placed reasonably close to the operation releasing vapors,make-up is by infiltration through doors,windows,and wails so that <br /> a reasonable amount of dilution occurs as the contaminant is generated, and the worker is not too near or in the zone of <br /> concentrated contaminant release Under such circumstances, the average K factor may be taken as 4 so that the average <br /> concentration in the workroom is 1/4 of the TLV and the concentration in any part of the workroom will probably not be <br /> higher that the TLV <br /> However, average distribution conditions are probably as elusive as ideal conditions and the need anses for a actual <br /> conditions,whether poor,average,good,or excellent Poor distnbution,such as may be caused by short circuiting the make- <br /> up air, inadequacy of infiltration as a sources of make-up air, location of the worker directly downstream form or in the <br /> evolving vapors,will require a higher factory of safety than 4 A lower factor may be used with good distribution, which will <br /> usually consist of a positive mechanical make-up air supply system with properly placed supply and exhaust fans Excellent <br /> distribution will be provided by properly located exhaust fans with a mechanical supply system directing tempered air in the <br /> optimum manner by means of diffusers, ductwork, or a perforated plenum This will make possible a further reduction in <br /> safety factor <br /> Effect of Toxicity The TLV or relative toxicity of the substance being controlled enters into the design directly since it is part <br /> of the calculation formula Where the TLV(in ppm)of a substance has been promulgated by a recognized authority such as <br /> the ACGIH or the American Standards Association,it is recommended that dilution ventilation rates be calculated using this <br /> TLV value in equation (1 2) and applying the safety factors shown in K Factors Table For other substances, the general <br /> equations in the Dilution CFM Formula Equations,as well as the K Factor Table should be used <br /> Dilution CFM Formula Equations <br /> Slightly toxic cfm= 1 x 10 d rots DLaporated pg mm K <br /> substances mol wt <br /> Moderately toxic cf n= 2 x 10 d ints evaporated M mm <br /> substances mol wt <br /> Highly toxic cfm=(8 x 106)(dXi)ints evaporated per mm)(K) <br /> substances mol wt <br /> d=specific gravity of liquid <br /> mol wt=molecular weight of liquid <br /> The general dilution ventilation equations have been derived form equation (1 2) using arbitrary values of 400 ppm as the <br /> TLV for slightly toxic substances,and 200 ppm for moderately toxic substances,and 50 ppm for highly toxic substances <br /> If more knowledge were available,a rational method for designing dilution ventilation for such mixtures could be formulated <br /> In the absence of such information,dilution ventilation rates should be calculated for each component of the mixture and the <br /> cfm values obtained added together to give a total cfm rate A method which is occasionally used to afford greater safety is to <br /> 46 assume that the entire volume of mixture being evaporated consists of the component with the highest cfin rate per pmt and to <br /> calculated cfm accordingly <br /> Page #10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.