My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524190
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 2:10:20 PM
Creation date
4/3/2020 1:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0524190
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016241
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON REGIONAL WATER CONTROL FAC
STREET_NUMBER
2500
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16333003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2500 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
729
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT -3- <br /> STOCKTON REGIONAL WASTEWATER CONTROL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Plan DO water quality objective of 5 mg/l (if the City cannot immediately comply <br /> with them after they have been reconsidered as stated above). <br /> e. Possible consideration of future projects, including changes in the Delta operations <br /> and expansion of the City's reclamation project, as alternatives to compliance with <br /> more stringent CBOD and ammonia effluent limitations, if these alternatives can be <br /> demonstrated to achieve the goal of compliance with the applicable DO water quality <br /> objectives within the time period permitted in the time extension or compliance <br /> schedule. <br /> The stay of the effluent limitations for ammonia and receiving water limitations for DO that was <br /> established in SWRCB Order No.WQ 95-1 was continued. In all other respects, the NPDES permit <br /> remained in full force and effect. <br /> ADDITIONAL REGULATORY ACTIVITIES <br /> Ongoing studies and regulations surrounding the San Joaquin River and Delta have emerged since <br /> the issuance of the remand by the SWRCB. Stockton completed its Risk Assessment in May 1996; <br /> however, the Department of Health Services (DHS) did not complete its review and comment of the <br /> study until November 1999. The Discharger performed evaluations for mercury, mineralization, <br /> and ability to comply with the Thermal Plan throughout 1996. The Discharger refined a river model <br /> in 1997 which it had initially developed in 1993. To evaluate the impact of new flow standards on <br /> Stockton area DO, the Regional Board, SWRCB,Department of Water Resources, and the City <br /> coordinated monitoring of river flows and DO impacts, which took about two years. In January <br /> 1998 the Regional Board adopted a revised 303(d) list which identified DO deficiencies within the <br /> San Joaquin River and the Delta as a high priority problem and that total maximum daily limits <br /> (TMDLs) should be developed. The 1999 Bay Protection and Toxic Cleanup Program(BPTCP) <br /> also identified the San Joaquin River near Stockton as a toxic hot spot due to low DO. The BPTCP <br /> provided a strategy to collect the information necessary to implement the TMDL. Finally,the <br /> Environmental Impact Report for Implementation of the 1995 Bay/Delta Water Quality Control <br /> Plan was released in November 1999. Water management practices or flow objectives for the <br /> Delta, as outlined in the Bay/Delta Plan, were only recently finalized in December 1999 under <br /> Water Rights Decision 1641; however, the SWRCB did not take any water right action to meet the <br /> DO objectives. As a result of the continual influx of information from the on-going studies and <br /> pending regulations, and lack of staff, the permit was not reopened to address the issues of the <br /> remand. <br /> PERMIT RENEWAL ISSUES <br /> A number of important and complex issues face Board staff with permit renewal process for the <br /> City of Stockton RWCF. These issues will require a considerable amount of research and <br /> evaluation on the part of Board staff to resolve. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.