My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524190
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 2:10:20 PM
Creation date
4/3/2020 1:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0524190
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016241
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON REGIONAL WATER CONTROL FAC
STREET_NUMBER
2500
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16333003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2500 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
729
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� 1 <br /> STAFF REPORT -5- <br /> STOCKTON REGIONAL WASTEWATER CONTROL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> production, sediment oxygen demand, and discharge from the RWCF. Therefore solutions to <br /> comply with the DO objectives need to be developed through the TMDL process, which is <br /> underway. <br /> The BPTCP,Regional Toxic Hot Spot Cleanup Plan proposed how to deal with NPDES <br /> permitting during the interim period while the TMDL is developed. The text states in part, <br /> "Where dischargers are a significant contributor to the River's DO problem, improvement in <br /> the effluent quality may be required prior to completion of a TMDL...However, load <br /> reductions from existing dischargers will not be required if satisfactory progress is being <br /> made on TMDL development unless it is clear before the process has been completed that the <br /> specific load reduction would be required even under the TMDL. It will be assumed that <br /> satisfactory progress is being made if the majority of the studies to determine load allocations <br /> are underway by December 1999, and it appears likely, that the Steering Committee will <br /> recommend a TMDL implementation plan, including load allocations, to the Regional Board <br /> staff by the year 2002." The Regional Board found, at its last meeting, that "reasonable <br /> progress" is being made. Staff must determine whether load reductions must be required in <br /> the permit renewal, or if decisions should be delayed until the TMDL implementation plan is <br /> approved. <br /> 5. Ammonia/Nitrogen <br /> Ammonia has been reported in the effluent and receiving waters. Review of self-monitoring <br /> reports by the Discharger and additional ambient data collected by others indicate that a <br /> significant amount of ammonia is discharged by the facility from October through March. In <br /> addition to considerations with regard to receiving water DO, effluent limitations for near- and <br /> far-field toxicity will need to be considered. Staff will need to evaluate the possibility of <br /> requiring the Discharger to nitrify the wastewater. Nitrogen in any form can stimulate algal <br /> growth, which can contribute to DO problems, so denitrification of the effluent will also need <br /> to be considered. <br /> 6. Reasonable Potential Analysis <br /> Metals, volatile organic compounds, semi-volatile compounds, salts and inorganic <br /> compounds, which have been reported by the Discharger, will need to be thoroughly reviewed <br /> by staff. An analysis must be performed to determine if any of the constituents have <br /> reasonable potential to cause or contribute to a violation of Basin Plan numeric or narrative <br /> receiving water objectives, and if effluent limitations for these compounds should be required <br /> in the new permit. If the California Toxics Rule (CTR)is adopted, staff will also evaluate the <br /> reasonable potential to cause or contribute to a violation of a CTR objective. <br /> 7. Mercury <br /> Mercury is listed under the Federal 303(d) list as a pollutant causing impairment in the <br /> Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. This listing is based partly on elevated levels of mercury in <br /> fish tissue. The discharge must not cause or contribute to an increased mercury level in fish <br /> tissue. Mercury has been detected in the effluent of the Discharger and therefore, a mass <br /> effluent limitation will need to be considered and developed for the permit. As with the DO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.