Laserfiche WebLink
City of Stockton -3- 14 August 1990 <br /> II (toxicity identification) , and phase III (toxicity confirmation) <br /> TIE work will commence and be completed, (ii ) dates when Regional <br /> Board and City staff and Consultants will meet to review data and <br /> discuss succeeding phases of the project. <br /> 2. Monthly written progress report should be submitted which summarize all <br /> the results obtained during the previous month and interpret them in <br /> light of all previously obtained data. In addition, the City should use <br /> the reports to request any workplan changes thought necessary to <br /> successfully complete the TIE/TRE goals. <br /> 3. A Final Report due i May 1991 should be submitted which contains: <br /> a) A list of the name(s) of the chemical (s) causing toxicity and a summary <br /> all the data supporting the conclusion. <br /> b) If the City elected the treatability option, the Report must precisely <br /> describe the treatment method and time schedule to be used to eliminate <br /> toxicity. <br /> c) If the City elects a) , above, then a time schedule must be submitted for <br /> developing and implementing a treatment strategy to insure that no <br /> further violations of the toxic provision of the permit occur with regard <br /> to the identified chemicals. <br /> II. CERIODAPHNIA TOXICITY <br /> A. Background <br /> Order No. 86-088 states, in part, that "The discharge shall not cause concentrations <br /> of any materials in the receiving waters which are deleterious to human, animal , <br /> aquatic or plant life. Order No. 86-088 also directs the City to conduct EPA's three <br /> species toxicity testing (EPA/500/4-85%014) of its effluent for a one year period and <br /> for Board staff to then analyze the data and develop effluent toxicity limits pursuant <br /> to EPA's Water Quality based Technical Support Document (EPA/440/4-85/032) . The <br /> purpose of the toxicity limits are to insure that the effluent produces no acute or <br /> chronic instream toxicity, using the three species test as a measurement of compliance. <br /> Initial City chronic testing demonstrated that too much acute toxicity to the <br /> invertebrate Ceriodaohnia was present in the effluent making chronic testing not <br /> meaningful . A 48-hour static acute test with Ceriodaphnia was used instead as a <br /> screening test. When the screening test showed acute toxicity was present in the <br /> effluent, staff decided it would be better to work with the City on a TIE/TRE to <br /> determine the cause and to develop corrective actions rather than to impose numerical <br /> permit limits which would place the City out of compliance. However, this decision was <br /> predicated upon the City of Stockton making a continued good faith effort to address <br /> toxicity problems. <br /> The initial TIE/TRE was completed in 1988 and the cause of invertebrate toxicity was <br /> determined to be the use of the pesticides Temephos and Fenthion to control midges in <br /> the City's oxidation ponds. The City now employs the bacteria Bacillus thurinaiencis <br />