My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524190
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 2:10:20 PM
Creation date
4/3/2020 1:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0524190
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016241
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON REGIONAL WATER CONTROL FAC
STREET_NUMBER
2500
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16333003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2500 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
729
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Gary M. Carlton <br /> Page 2 <br /> November 23, 1999 <br /> sufficiently characterize the range of removal rates provided by the treatment plant, <br /> especially given the critical nature of this parameter in the health risk assessment. <br /> 3. How does the risk of infection vary with proximity of recreation activities to the outfall <br /> plume? The study does not differentiate between various zones (nodes) on the <br /> receiving area in terms of exposure to pathogens from the treatment plant effluent. <br /> These differences should be examined, as they might be significant. <br /> 4. How does the risk of infection vary with the immunological status of the recreating <br /> public? The risk assessment assumes that "the population is homogeneous with <br /> respect to susceptibility to disease' (bullet 3, page 4-5), and provides no information <br /> on the potential risks to illness to the following types of individuals should they <br /> recreate near the wastewater treatment facility outfall: <br /> • young, or very young, children <br /> • immuno-compromised adults <br /> • the elderly <br /> The entire recreating public does not need to be assumed to be members of these <br /> susceptible populations, but to not discuss them at all is inappropriate. <br /> 5. Are there other significant routes of exposure to effluent-bome pathogens in addition <br /> to body-contact recreation that need to be analyzed? This report focuses on <br /> recreational watercraft use, and does not address a number of other potential <br /> exposure pathways that the RWQCB needs to consider. These include the following <br /> uses of water in and from the San Joaquin River: <br /> • as a source of irrigation water, particularly as sprayed upon leafy vegetables <br /> which may be harvested for immediate consumption, and <br /> • as a source of freshwater shellfish harvested for food use. (We understand that <br /> this occurs, particularly among immigrants from Southeast Asia.) <br /> Based upon the information that is now available, we recommend that the Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board require the City of Stockton to modify its wastewater <br /> treatment plant to enhance pathogen reduction in the plant effluent. Such modifications <br /> should include filtration and enhanced disinfection sufficient to comply with the following <br /> criteria: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.