Laserfiche WebLink
Implementation of Alternative 2 was rejected primarily because it was determined to be less <br /> incrementally effective when compared to Alternative 1, and potentially no more effective ft <br /> was shown t at Alternative 1 rrunimIzes the likelihood of imposing a burden on the people of <br /> the State with the expense of remediation <br /> 3201357BICAP of April 4, 1995 <br />