Laserfiche WebLink
1 - <br /> 08 June 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 98-0433 <br />' Page 5 of 8 <br />' 3 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF SOIL AND GRAB GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> TPH-g and TPH-d were detected In soil samples collected from boring B 17 at 20 feet and 30 feet <br />' bsg,at maximum concentrations of 71 milligrams per kilogram(mg/kg)and 230 mg/kg,respectively, <br /> In the sample from 20 feet bsg <br />' BTEX compounds were not detected In the soil samples analyzed <br /> MTBE was detected by EPA method 8260B in soil sample B17-20 at a concentration of 0 3 mg/kg <br /> In addition,MTBE was detested by EPA method 8021 In samples at collected at 25 feet, 30 feet and <br /> 35 feet bsg at concentrations of 0 048 mg/kg, 0 092 mg/kg and 0 03 mg/kg, respectively <br /> C" <br /> TPH-g was detected In grab ground water sample B 17 at a concentration of 240µg/l,TPH-d was not <br /> detected Ethylbenzene and total xylene were detected at concentrations of 0 61µg/1 and 1 1 Pg/l, <br /> respectively <br /> I MTBE was detected b EPA method 8260B in water sample B17 at a concentration of 160 l <br /> Y p µ� �. <br /> TBA was also detected at 36µg/1 <br /> No other target analytes were detected in the soil and grab ground water samples analyzed <br /> Analytical results are summarized In Table 3 The laboratory report (CalTech Lab ID 0202-001-1 <br /> to-6), quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) and chain-of-custody are Included In <br /> Appendix C <br /> 3 4 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> On 19 February 2002,depth to ground water at the site ranged from 19 33 to 21 09 feet below well <br /> casing tops The ground water elevations at the site ranged from 37 26 feet (MW-4) to 37 75 feet <br />' (MW-5) above mean sea level (MSL) The data Indicates an average decrease of the ground water <br /> elevation at the site of 0 5 feet since the previous quarterly monitoring event <br />' Ground water flow direction and gradient were calculated from the February 2002 gauging data An <br /> Inferred easterly trending groundwater ridge appears to bisect the site(Figure 3) North of the former <br /> UST location ground water flows northerly at a gradient of approximately 0 001 ft/ft From the <br /> former UST location southwards,groundwater flows In a south-southeasterly direction at a gradient <br /> of approximately 0 0001 ft/ft,at such a low gradient,small measurement variations can greatly affect <br /> the Inferred flow direction <br /> • The contoured ground water elevations are Illustrated in Figure 3, the depth to ground water and <br /> I calculated elevation data are presented in Table 1 <br /> Advanced Ceo>rnvironmental,Iric <br />