Laserfiche WebLink
t0 November 1999 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 98-0433 <br /> ' 'Mage 3 of 13, <br /> GRAB GROUND WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION <br /> Probe borings B2; B5, B 14; B 17 and B 1.8 were also sampled for ground water. A temporary, pre- <br /> cleaned, one-inch 0.01 slotted well screen was placed into the soil boring to a depth of 2.0 feet bsg. <br /> After sample retrieval, the water sampler was disassembled and cleaned. New Teflon tubing «was <br /> used to collect each sample. Each ground water sample was extracted by lo-,vering a modified Teflon <br /> ' bailer into the screen section of the temporary wells. Samples were collected in three laboratory- <br /> supplied, 40-ii1 volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials containing 0.5 ml of hydrochloric acid (18%) <br /> ' as sample preservative and in one 1-liter amber bottle according to Standard A-Tethods. `File labeled <br /> vials were placed in a chilled container under ice and transported udder chain-'of-custody to N!A[ .tor <br /> analysis. <br /> 3.4. LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SOIL AND GROUND WATER SA1\-111LT:S <br /> CJ'round «water sans les and selected soil sarll Ales vc-c analvred L'or: <br /> p 1 <br /> M Total petroleurlr hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-{) and "IPH-d) in <br /> accordance with EPA Method 8015 Ivlodifed, <br /> • Volatile aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene.and total xylene: BTE&X) <br /> in accordance with LPA Method 8020, <br /> • Oxygenated fuel additives: diethyl butyl ether (MTBE,); tertian}w brttyl alcohol (TBA), di <br /> isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (E'IBE) and tertiary amyl InctlIN1 ether- <br /> (TAiIN,1E) in accordance with EPA INTethod 8•:260 \,todiCed arld <br /> ' <br /> Two soil samples were transported to an independerrt illicrobiologist, Mr, A. Keith <br /> Kaufmann of Culver City. California. and were analyzed fiir physicochemical properties and <br /> microbiological enurlrci rtion. Dat;l obtained from the microbiological aiaci plrysicoclrerllical <br /> ' analysis will be used to determine possible effectiveness of bio-remediation as a remedUitiorl <br /> alternative. <br /> 3.5. GROUND WA"I'LR MONITORING \Vl-, <br /> INSTALLATION <br /> t Oil 19 itnd 20 Au-ust 1.999. AUT, condo ,< <br /> conducted a srtc nlvcstr� ttroil that rncluclecl the advancement of <br /> soil boriul s, collection and analysis of soil samples, and installation and developincnt of growid <br /> w;rter nlonaoring wells. Additionally, on 25 AuguSt 1999, ground water sarllIII eS VVeCc collected fronl <br /> arch of the ground water monitor-111g wells. Prior to illobiliz<rtion of drillirl ecluipillerlt, the site <br /> J <br /> Adronced Geol-'nvirasIII ell L,c. <br />