Laserfiche WebLink
A� y <br /> groundwater in the area is approximately 10 feet. The regional groundwater gradient is <br /> towards the west or southwest. <br /> x <br /> 3.0 PROCEDURES <br /> 3.1 Drilling and Sampling <br /> On November 17, 1993, one soil boring was drilled at the site. At the suggestion of the <br /> PHS/EHD and Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB), the <br /> boring was drilled immediately east of the excavation, thereby placing the boring between <br /> the excavation and the on-site domestic water well. The chosen location for MW-1 is up- <br /> gradient of the tank cavity, according to the San Joaquin County Flood Control Map (1990). <br /> The boring was advanced to a depth of 25 feet and completed as groundwater monitoring <br /> well MW-1. Auger returns were placed on plastic sheeting and stored on-site. The <br /> monitoring well location is illustrated on Figure 2. <br /> The boring was drilled using a truck-mounted CME-75 drill rig. The drill rig and two-man <br /> - crew were supplied by Mitchell Drilling Environmental Corporation. During drilling, auger <br /> returns were monitored for the presence of organic vapors using a photo-ionization detector <br /> (PID: Thermo Environmental 580A, 10.0 eV, calibrated to isobutylene). Discrete soil <br /> samples were collected ahead of the drill bit using a split-tube sampler loaded with three <br /> pre-cleaned 2-inch by 6-inch brass sleeves. The samples were collected at five-foot intervals, <br /> using a 140 pound hammer to advance the sampler 18 inches. The number of blows <br /> required to advance the sampler in 6-inch increments was recorded on the boring logs. To <br /> avoid cross contamination, the sampling equipment was washed in a tri-sodium phosphate <br /> (TSP) solution and rinsed twice with water prior to each sampling run. <br /> For each sample, both ends of the lead tube were covered with aluminum sheets, capped <br /> and sealed with tape. The samples were then stored on ice and transported under chain-of- <br /> custody to McCampbeil Analytical Inc. in Pacheco, California. <br /> 3.2 Logging <br /> Soil was extruded from the second brass tube and screened for the presence of organic <br /> vapors, using a PID, and the readings were recorded on the boring logs. The soil was then <br /> described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (see Boring Log, <br /> Appendix A). <br /> 3.3 Well Completion <br /> The boring was completed as groundwater monitoring well MW-1 using 2-inch diameter <br /> PVC casing with 0.020 screen from 25 to 5 feet. The filter pack (#3 Lonestar sand) was <br /> installed from 25 to 3.5 feet. Bentonite chips were used to make a plug and the well was <br /> 6w1eeiwl Audit Serv:a.Ino <br /> Revd Pr po ty/12-1693 ]&S <br />