My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2005-2014
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROTH
>
850
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506824
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2005-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2020 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
4/7/2020 2:34:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2005-2014
RECORD_ID
PR0506824
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007648
FACILITY_NAME
DDRW - SHARPES
STREET_NUMBER
850
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ROTH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19802001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
850 E ROTH RD BLDG S-108
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• TIME SCHEDULE ORDER NO. R5-2005- 2 <br /> U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE <br /> DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY <br /> DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION DEPOT SAN JOAQUIN <br /> SHARPE GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION SYSTEM <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 3. The effluent limitation specified in Order No. R5-2005-213 for arsenic is based on the Basin Plan <br /> chemical constituents objective and the US Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA) <br /> Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL). The Discharger has requested an extension on the To <br /> compliance date for the arsenic in order to test and construct, as necessary, sufficient disposal ILA <br /> ponds to eliminate all discharge of treated groundwater to local surface waters. <br /> Lu <br /> NEED FOR TIME SCHEDULE ORDER(TSO) AND LEGAL BASIS <br /> 4. The Discharger operates the groundwater treatment system as part of a remedial action to clean <br /> groundwater polluted with volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Extracted groundwater is treated <br /> by air-stripping. This site is on the USEPA's National Priorities List for cleanup. Cleanup <br /> activities for the polluted groundwater began in 1987, and the remediation work is being <br /> conducted under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act <br /> (CERCLA) at the direction of Remedial Project Managers from the Regional Board,USEPA, and <br /> the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Through operation of this facility,the <br /> Discharger has removed a significant amount of the VOC mass from the underlying groundwater. <br /> The Discharger expects to test and construct sufficient on-site disposal ponds and eliminate <br /> discharge of treated groundwater to surface waters by 23 January 2009. Local shallow <br /> groundwater is heavily mineralized and the Discharger's effluent is not expected to adversely <br /> impact groundwater quality and will help recharge local groundwater. <br /> 5. California Water Code (CWC) Section 13300 states: "Whenever a regional board finds that a <br /> discharge of waste is taking place or threatening to take place that violates or will violate <br /> requirements prescribed by the regional board, or the state board, or that the waste collection, <br /> treatment, or disposal facilities of a discharger are approaching capacity, the board may require <br /> the discharger to submit for approval of the board, with such modifications as it may deem <br /> necessary, a detailed time schedule ofspecifc actions the discharger shall take in order to correct <br /> or prevent a violation of requirements." <br /> 6. Federal regulations, 40 CFR Part 122.44 (d)(1)(i), require that NPDES permit effluent limitations <br /> must control all pollutants which are or may be discharged at a level which will cause or have the <br /> reasonable potential to cause or contribute to an in-stream excursion above any State water quality <br /> standard, including any narrative criteria for water quality. Beneficial uses, together with their <br /> corresponding water quality objectives or promulgated water quality criteria, can be defined per <br /> federal regulations as water quality standards. <br /> 7. Immediate compliance with the new effluent limitation for arsenic is not possible or practicable. <br /> The Clean Water Act and the California Water Code authorize time schedules for achieving Lu <br /> compliance as soon as possible, up to a maximum duration of 5 years,which is the maximum term <br /> of any NPDES permit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.