My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1988-1991
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROTH
>
850
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506824
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1988-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2020 3:14:45 PM
Creation date
4/7/2020 2:36:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1988-1991
RECORD_ID
PR0506824
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007648
FACILITY_NAME
DDRW - SHARPES
STREET_NUMBER
850
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ROTH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19802001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
850 E ROTH RD BLDG S-108
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
470
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARARs and TBCs for SuAd Sites -8- • 17 May 1991 <br /> water quality limits using conservative assumptions regarding the attenuation of the <br /> constituents and/or environmental fate analysis. This methodology could be used at <br /> CERCLA sites to determine the classification of wastes and contaminated soils proposed <br /> to be left on-site. Therefore, the staff report would be a chemical-specific, action-specific, <br /> and location-specific TBC. <br /> According to EPA's CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual, "ARARs (and TBCs <br /> necessary for protection), pertaining both to contaminant levels and to performance or <br /> design standards, should generally be attained at all points of potential exposure, or at <br /> the point specified by the ARAB itself. CERCLA requires, to the maximum extent <br /> practicable, the use of permanent solutions... Restrictions on use or access should not be <br /> a substitute for remediation to appropriate...levels." The Designated Level Methodology is <br /> also used by the Regional Board to determine the degree to which contaminated soils <br /> should be cleaned so that they do not threaten to adversely impact existing and probable <br /> future beneficial uses of waters of the state. Soil cleanup levels determined by this <br /> methodology are based on water quality objectives and,in the case of narrative <br /> objectives, numerical limits taken from the Water Quality Goals staff report. The basis of <br /> the methodology is similar to CERCLA risk assessment, except that the waters of the state <br /> act as the receptor. In California, this is necessary because Porter-Cologne requires the <br /> Regional Boards to restore or maintain beneficial uses throughout an affected or <br /> potentially affected body of water. The Designated Level Methodology could be used at <br /> CERCLA sites to determine soil cleanup levels and resulting remedial actions and, <br /> therefore, would be a chemical-specific, action-specific, and location-specific TBC. <br /> ,fit/RJY <br /> Attachment <br /> cc: Regional Board Federal Superfund Program Managers <br /> John Adams, Division of Clean Water Programs, State Water Resources Control Board <br /> Betsy Jennings, Office of the Chief Counsel, State Water Resources Control Board <br /> Frances McChesney, Office of the Chief Counsel, SWRCB <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.