My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1988-1991
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROTH
>
850
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506824
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1988-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2020 3:14:45 PM
Creation date
4/7/2020 2:36:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1988-1991
RECORD_ID
PR0506824
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007648
FACILITY_NAME
DDRW - SHARPES
STREET_NUMBER
850
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ROTH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19802001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
850 E ROTH RD BLDG S-108
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
470
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Remedial Investigation Report -8- 8 March 1991 <br /> DDRW, Sharpe <br /> FINDING <br /> 18. Significantly elevated levels of arsenic, selenium, and Bromacil in the ground <br /> water are almost completely confined to the shallowest aquifer zone. <br /> RESPONSE <br /> 18. I concur with this finding. <br /> FINDING <br /> 19. Spatial and frequency distribution patterns of arsenic occurrence in soil and <br /> ground water do not dictate an on-site source. <br /> RESPONSE <br /> 19. Finding is noted. However, the Report does not present the graphics that would <br /> readily lend themselves to this conclusion. The specific concentrations of <br /> arsenic in the ground water from each well were not plotted on a map. In <br /> addition, the concentrations within the upper five feet of the soils borings were <br /> not plotted on a map. Therefore, it is more difficult to make conclusions <br /> regarding distribution and potential sources areas without the aid of these <br /> graphics. <br /> FINDING <br /> 20. Selenium contamination in soil and ground water at SHAD is minimal . <br /> RESPONSE <br /> 20. In general , I concur with this finding. There are only a few monitor wells which <br /> had selenium concentrations greater than the Primary DWS. <br /> FINDING <br /> 21. Bromacil contamination in soil and ground water at SHAD is minimal . <br /> RESPONSE <br /> 21. In general , I concur with this finding. However, there are several areas of <br /> elevated Bromacil concentrations in the ground water. A DWS has not been <br /> established for Bromacil . The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Suggested No <br /> Adverse Response Level (SNARL) for Bromacil is 90 µg/l . The maximum <br /> concentration of Bromacil in well 407A at 773 µg/l is significantly greater than <br /> the EPA SNARL. The areas of highly elevated concentrations of Bromacil may <br /> require remediation. <br /> FINDING <br /> 22. Soil concentrations of arsenic off-site are indistinguishable from those on-site. <br /> RESPONSE <br /> 22. Finding is noted. This finding is based on the comparison of sample populations <br /> using 20 off-site soil samples and 39 on-site soil samples. Over 400 on-site soil <br /> samples were collected for analysis. The Report does not state what criteria were <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.