Laserfiche WebLink
contaminants onsite above levels that allow unlimited use and unrestricted exposure. This <br /> assessment appears to be consistent with EPA guidance for Five-Year Reviews. <br /> However, the OU 2 remedial actions (e.g., Sites S-3 and S-26 discussed in a previous <br /> comment) left contaminants at industrial levels that appear to necessitate a statutory <br /> review. Please explain why the Five-Year Review for DDJC-Sharpe is not required by <br /> statute when residual contaminants in soils at OU 2 do not allow unlimited use and <br /> unrestricted exposure. <br /> 2 <br />