My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1993-2003
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROTH
>
850
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506824
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1993-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2020 3:15:47 PM
Creation date
4/7/2020 2:41:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1993-2003
RECORD_ID
PR0506824
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007648
FACILITY_NAME
DDRW - SHARPES
STREET_NUMBER
850
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ROTH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19802001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
850 E ROTH RD BLDG S-108
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
491
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPECIFIC COMAMNTS <br /> 1. Section 2.2.3, Geology and Hydrology, Page 3: The Work Plan indicates that local <br /> hydraulic gradient of groundwater, normally to the northwest, has been impacted by <br /> pumping from the extraction wells. However, the Work Plan does not discuss how the <br /> groundwater gradient has changed or how the current hydraulic gradient of groundwater <br /> has been affected by site activities. In addition, the Work Plan should discuss how the <br /> potential impact the percolation pond may have on plume migration will be evaluated. <br /> Please clarify these issues. <br /> 2. Section 4.0, Field Investigation Approach, Page 3: There is no indication how <br /> inclement weather such as rain will be handled. Such events can affect the Phase I and <br /> Phase 11 test by adding additional water that is not part of the test (especially Phase II). <br /> Please clarify this issue. <br /> 3. Section 4.1.2, Phased Approach,Page 4: The Work Plan states, .....soil samples will be <br /> held, should the design team request a lab percolation test or want to evaluate the soil <br /> types in the recommended design area." Please provide the decision criteria that will be <br /> used to determine which samples will be sent to the laboratory for percolation tests and <br /> which samples will be selected to represent soil types. <br /> 4. Section 4.1.2,Phased Approach,Phase I - Borings/Permeability Testing <br /> Investigation,Page 4: The Work Plan indicates that 17 borings or approximately one <br /> boring per acre will be used to conduct the pilot study. Please provide information to <br /> justify whether the number and locations of the borings will provide a representative <br /> estimate of the permeability across the proposed pond location. <br /> 5. Section 4.3.1, Phase I - Borings/Permeability Testing Investigation,Page 4: The Work <br /> Plan references two procedures that may be followed for conducting the permeability tests <br /> in the boreholes: Designation E-18 and Designation E-19 (U.S. Bureau of Reclamation) <br /> and indicates that an alternative approach to these procedures may be used. Please provide <br /> some discussion as to appropriateness of the E-18 and E-19 procedures and under what <br /> conditions an alternative procedure may be required. <br /> 6. Section 4.3.2, Phase I - Borings/Permeability Testing Investigation, Page 4: The Work <br /> Plan does not address how the test borings will be constructed, designed or installed other <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.