My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1993-2003
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROTH
>
850
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506824
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1993-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2020 3:15:47 PM
Creation date
4/7/2020 2:41:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1993-2003
RECORD_ID
PR0506824
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007648
FACILITY_NAME
DDRW - SHARPES
STREET_NUMBER
850
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ROTH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19802001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
850 E ROTH RD BLDG S-108
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
491
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM • <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD - CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A Phone: (916) 255-3000 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 CALNET: 8-494-3000 <br /> TO: enia K. J. Vorster FROM: James Taylor <br /> or WRC Engineer Associate Engineering ologist <br /> DATE: 4 May 1993 SIGNATURE: <br /> SUBJECT: THIRTY PERCENT/DRAFT SUBMITTALS FOR CENTRAL AREA OPERABLE UNIT 1 (OU-1) <br /> REMEDIAL DESIGN, DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION REGION WEST (DDRW), SHARPE, SAN <br /> JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed the above referenced submittals received 5 March 1993. These <br /> documents were prepared by Montgomery Watson (M-W) for the U. S. Army Corps of <br /> Engineers (CoE) and include the following 30 percent submittal items: <br /> ► Remedial Design Report and Analysis <br /> ► Technical Specifications <br /> ► Plans <br /> The 30 percent submittals are first in a series of submittals which will include 60, <br /> 95, and 100 percents Remedial Design documents. Along with the submittal of <br /> remedial design documents, copies of draft, draft final , and final work plans will <br /> be prepared and submitted for review. The draft plans reviewed include the <br /> following: <br /> ► Service Contract Document, Personnel Training Plan, Operation and <br /> Maintenance Plan <br /> ► Construction Quality Assurance Plan <br /> ► Field Sampling Plan, Groundwater Monitoring Plan <br /> ► Health and Safety Plan <br /> ► Remedial Action Work Plan <br /> Also reviewed with the 30 percent/draft submittals are the Response to Comments on <br /> the Draft Final Pre-Design Technical Summary Report, Remedial Design Work Plan, <br /> Draft Work Plan Addendum, and Health and Safety Plan Addendum. Most of our concerns <br /> have been addressed in the Response To Comments without significant changes to the <br /> Summary Report, however, the Army Environmental Center' s (AEC) involvement and role <br /> in the Remedial Design (RD) activities still needs to be clarified. Specifically, <br /> AEC is overseeing the construction and testing of the extraction and injection <br /> wells. The Remedial Design Plans do not address the coordination between the CoE <br /> and AEC with respect to the RD. We expect that DDRW, Sharpe will provide the <br /> assurance that the RD work conducted by AEC will be transmitted to and incorporated <br /> by the CoE. <br /> Overall , the reports in this submittal contain the basic elements needed to proceed <br /> with the 60 percent design phase. My comments on the 30 percent, and draft plan <br /> submittals referenced above, are listed below. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.