Laserfiche WebLink
• MEMORANDUM • <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD - CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A Phone: (916) 255-3000 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 CALNET: 8-494-3000 <br /> TO: Antonia K. J. Vorster �V I FROM: Camilla Williams <br /> Senior WRC Engineer Engineering Geologist <br /> DATE: 22 December 1992 SIGNATURE: <br /> SUBJECT: REVIEW OF THE DRAFT FINAL RECORD OF DECISION (ROD), DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION <br /> REGION WEST (DDRW), SHARPE, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed the Draft Final ROD for DDRW, Sharpe submitted on 23 November <br /> 1992. The Draft Final ROD was submitted by the U. S. Army Toxic and Hazardous <br /> Material Agency (USATHAMA) . Sharpe has made considerable progress in the Remedial <br /> Investigation/Feasibility (RI/FS) Study and in the overall cleanup of the site. <br /> Sharpe has conducted three-dimensional (3-D) modeling, has proposed effluent <br /> treatment standards based on best available technology (BAT) for the Central Area <br /> Treatment Plant and has accepted the State Water Resources Control Board <br /> Resolution No. 68-16 (Anti-Degradation Policy) as an Acceptable or Relevant and <br /> Appropriate Requirement (ARAR) . In addition, Sharpe has operated two Interim <br /> Remedial Measures (IRMs) in the North and South Balloon Areas which have been <br /> treating volatile organic constituent (VOC) contaminated ground water since 1987 <br /> and 1990, respectively. We commend Sharpe for these actions. <br /> However, I have two major concerns with the Draft Final ROD. First, the <br /> Substantive Waste Discharge Requirements (SWDRs) were not attached and were not <br /> referenced within the text of the Draft Final ROD. Second, the Draft Final ROD <br /> did not summarize the results of the 3-D numerical modeling and its affects on the <br /> conceptual plan for the RD. There appears to have been sufficient time for <br /> Sharpe/USATHAMA to make changes to the text of the Draft Final ROD regarding these <br /> issues. These major issues, as well as other comments, are discussed in more <br /> detail below. <br /> The draft of the SWDRs was attached to our 21 May 1992 letter on the Draft ROD. <br /> The SWDRs were negotiated during September and October 1992 with USATHAMA and the <br /> Corps of Engineers (COE) and on 6 November 1992, we transmitted the SWDRs to the <br /> Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Toxic Substances <br /> Control (DTSC) , as well as to USATHAMA and COE. The 12 November 1992 letter from <br /> the EPA stated that the Draft Final ROD should incorporate Table 8 (aquifer <br /> cleanup levels) and Table 9 (effluent treatment standards) , the SWDRs and a <br /> response to our 6 March 1992 letter on the Proposed Plan in the Responsiveness <br /> Summary. By letter dated 11 December 1992, we were notified by DDRW, Sharpe that <br /> there had been confusion in the preparation of the Draft Final ROD regarding the <br /> EPA's directives in their letter but that appropriate action was being taken to <br /> remedy the omission of the SWDRs from the Draft Final ROD. In addition, the 3-D <br /> Modeling Report was submitted on 14 October 1992, more than a month prior to <br /> submittal of the Draft Final ROD. <br /> The ROD must be revised to acknowledge the SWDRs and reflects actual knowledge <br /> about the RI/FS and conceptual plans for the Remedial Design/Remedial Action <br /> (RD/RA) . If the content of the revisions can be negotiated between Sharpe and the <br /> Board, then the ROD would become acceptable for signature by the Board. <br />