My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1993-2003
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROTH
>
850
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506824
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1993-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2020 3:15:47 PM
Creation date
4/7/2020 2:41:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1993-2003
RECORD_ID
PR0506824
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007648
FACILITY_NAME
DDRW - SHARPES
STREET_NUMBER
850
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ROTH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19802001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
850 E ROTH RD BLDG S-108
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
491
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO.R5-2002-0213 • 9 <br /> U.S.DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE <br /> DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY <br /> DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION DEPOT SAN JOAQUIN <br /> SHARPE GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION SYSTEM <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> CWA. Regulations promulgated at 40 CFR 122.44 (a) require technology-based effluent <br /> limitations to be placed in NPDES permits based on national effluent limitations guidelines and <br /> standards, best professional judgment (BPJ), or a combination of the two. <br /> 16. Previous Order No. 95-258 included daily maximum and monthly median effluent limitations for <br /> total volatile organic compounds (total VOCs) (1.0 µg/L(ppb) and<0.5µg/L (ppb), <br /> respectively) based upon technically achievable treatment levels for air strippers. These <br /> technology based effluent limitations still apply to the discharge, and total VOC constituents <br /> have been detected in influent groundwater,prior to treatment, at concentrations up to 57.7 µg/L <br /> (ppb). Therefore, the daily maximum and monthly median effluent limitations for total VOCs <br /> have been retained and included in this Order. <br /> 17. Where technology-based effluent limitations are inadequate to ensure compliance with water <br /> quality standards applicable to the receiving water,more stringent effluent limits based upon <br /> applicable water quality standards are imposed. <br /> 18. Federal regulations, 40 CFR Part 122.44 (d)(1)(i), require that NPDES permit effluent limitations <br /> must control all pollutants which are or may be discharged at a level which will cause or have the <br /> reasonable potential to cause or contribute to an in-stream excursion above any State water <br /> quality standard, including any narrative criteria for water quality. Beneficial uses, together with <br /> their corresponding water quality objectives, constitute the state water quality standards for <br /> purposes of compliance with the Clean Water Act. <br /> In determining whether a discharge has the reasonable potential to contribute to an in-stream <br /> excursion (reasonable potential analysis), the dilution of the effluent in the receiving water may <br /> be considered where areas of dilution are defined. The available dilution may also be used to <br /> calculate protective effluent limitations by applying water quality criteria at the edge of the <br /> defined mixing zone. These calculations include receiving water pollutant concentrations that <br /> are typically based on worst-case conditions for flow and concentration. <br /> If limited or no dilution is available, effluent limitations are set equal to the applicable water <br /> quality criteria which are applied at the point of discharge so the discharge will not cause the <br /> receiving stream to exceed water quality objectives established to protect the beneficial uses. In <br /> situations where receiving water flows are substantially greater than effluent flows, dilution may <br /> be considered in establishing effluent limitations. However, when a receiving water is impaired <br /> by a particular pollutant or stressor, limited or no pollutant assimilative capacity may be <br /> available in spite of the available dilution. In these instances, and depending upon the nature of <br /> the pollutant, effluent limitations may be set equal to or less than the applicable water quality <br /> criteria that are applied at the point of discharge such that the discharge will not cause or <br /> contribute to the receiving stream excursion above water quality objectives established to protect <br /> the beneficial uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.