Laserfiche WebLink
INFORMATION SHEET • • 19 <br /> WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIRMENTS ORDER NO. R5-2002-0213 <br /> U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE <br /> DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY <br /> DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION DEPOT SAN JOAQUIN <br /> SHARPE GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION SYSTEM <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Trace metal objectives in this table are dissolved concentrations. This Order requires the <br /> collection of additional effluent and receiving water data necessary to assess the impact of the <br /> discharge on these dissolved trace metal water quality objectives of the Delta. <br /> Toxicity <br /> At p.III-9.00 the Basin Plan provides that relative to toxicity : "All waters shall be maintained free of <br /> toxic substances in concentrations that produce detrimental physiological responses in human,plant, <br /> animal, or aquatic life." At page 1, the USEPA's Technical Support Document for Water Quality- <br /> based Toxics Control (TSD)provides that"Where States have not developed chemical specific numeric <br /> criteria, States may interpret their narrative standards for specific chemicals by using EPA criteria updated <br /> with current quantitative risk values." The TSD further states on page 1 "The integrated approach must <br /> include the control of toxics through implementation of the "no toxics"criterion and/or numeric criteria for <br /> the parameter of toxicity, the control of individual pollutants for which specific chemical water quality <br /> criteria exist in a state's standard, as well as the use of biological criteria. Reliance solely on the chemical <br /> specific numeric criteria or the narrative criterion or biological criteria would result in only a partially <br /> effective State toxics control program." <br /> Under the CWA Section 304(a), EPA has developed methodologies and specific criteria guidance <br /> to protect aquatic life and human health. These methodologies are intended to provide protection <br /> for all surface waters on a national basis. The methodologies have been subject to public review, <br /> as have the individual criteria guidance documents. Water quality criteria developed under Section <br /> 304(a) of the CWA are based solely on data and scientific judgments on the relationship between <br /> pollutant concentrations and environmental and human health effects. Section 304(a) criteria do <br /> not reflect consideration of economic impacts or the technological feasibility of meeting the <br /> chemical concentrations in ambient water. Section 304(a) criteria provide guidance to States in <br /> adopting water quality standards that ultimately provide a basis for controlling discharges or <br /> releases of pollutants. USEPA's ambient water quality criteria have been used as a means of <br /> supplementing the integrated approach to toxics control, and in some cases deriving numeric <br /> limitations to protect receiving waters from toxicity as required in the Basin Plan's narrative <br /> standard prohibiting the discharge of toxic constituents in toxic amounts. <br /> Regarding toxicity,previous studies of chlorpyrifos conducted by Regional Board staff in French <br /> Camp Slough have found chlorpyrifos concentrations as high as 0.520 gg/L (micrograms per <br /> Liter), which is nearly 10 times the 96-hour Ceriodaphnia LC50 (median lethal concentration). <br /> Additionally,results of receiving water monitoring conducted by the discharger have identified <br /> significant concentrations of aluminum in the SKID Canal and French Camp Slough. Results of <br /> receiving water monitoring in the SKID Canal from 7 July 1998 through 11 October 2001 indicate <br /> aluminum concentrations ranged from less than 200 µg/L (ppb) to 1.3 mg/L (ppm) (4/4/2000). <br /> Results of receiving water monitoring in French Camp Slough from 7 July 1998 through 10 July <br /> 2001 indicate aluminum concentrations ranged from 3.5 mg/L (ppm) (7/7/1998)to 6.2 mg/L(ppm) <br /> (7/13/1999). Results of monitoring conducted by the Discharger indicate concentrations of <br />