My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2004-2014
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROTH
>
850
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506824
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2004-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2020 2:56:47 PM
Creation date
4/7/2020 2:44:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2004-2014
RECORD_ID
PR0506824
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007648
FACILITY_NAME
DDRW - SHARPES
STREET_NUMBER
850
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ROTH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19802001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
850 E ROTH RD BLDG S-108
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comments on Focused Gro Awater - 2 - • 19 October 2007 <br /> Extraction Test — DDJC Sharpe <br /> COMMENTS ON RECOMMENDATIONS: <br /> 1. Groundwater extraction from MW418C appears to be more effective than from EWC3. <br /> Regional Water Board staff concurs with the recommendation not to resume extraction <br /> from EWC3, and to begin extraction from MW418C after the third quarter rebound period. <br /> 2. URS concluded that groundwater extraction from MW437C removes TCE from a portion <br /> of the water bearing zone that extraction from EWCC1 does not remove. However, the <br /> recommendation to cycle extraction over 6-month periods between the two wells would <br /> have the effect of reducing the total mass of TCE removed each year from the aquifer. <br /> Therefore, Regional Water Board staff does not concur with the recommendation. DDJC <br /> should proceed with planned further investigation at P-5A as this may help identify the <br /> source of TCE observed in MW437C. DDJC should resume extraction from EWCC1, <br /> and consider concurrent extraction from MW437C; this may increase the total TCE mass <br /> removal rate. <br /> 3. Regional Water Board staff concurs with DDJC's recommendation to complete model <br /> runs for development of recommendations that would optimize extraction rates and <br /> potentially identify locations for additional extraction wells. <br /> OTHER COMMENTS: <br /> 1. In Section 2.0.3, there is a typographical error in the screen interval description for <br /> monitoring well MW437C. <br /> 2. In Section 2.2.1, last sentence, there appears to be a typographical error in the <br /> designation of the rebound monitoring well. <br /> 3. The meaning of Section 3.2.4.2 is confusing and should be clarified, especially the last <br /> two sentences. <br /> If you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 464-4675, or by email at <br /> jbrownell@waterboards.ca.gov. <br /> ?James R. Brownell, M.S., P.G. <br /> Engineering Geologist <br /> Federal Facilities Cleanup Unit <br /> cc: Mr. Michael Work, US EPA Region 9 (San Francisco) <br /> Mr. Peter MacNicholl, DTSC Region 1 (Sacramento) <br /> Ms. Diane Hinson, San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (Stockton) <br /> Mr. Michael Thomas, URS (Sacramento) <br /> Ms. Sara Dwight, TechLaw, Inc (Sacramento) <br /> Mr. Rich Howard, TechLaw, Inc (Sacramento) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.