My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2004-2014
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
ROTH
>
850
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506824
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2004-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2020 2:56:47 PM
Creation date
4/7/2020 2:44:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2004-2014
RECORD_ID
PR0506824
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007648
FACILITY_NAME
DDRW - SHARPES
STREET_NUMBER
850
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ROTH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19802001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
850 E ROTH RD BLDG S-108
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Maurice Benson - 2 - 23 December 2009 <br /> Defense Logistics Agency <br /> 3. Has the potable well screen interval been determined? (Note: If the potable well screen <br /> interval is unknown, it must be assumed that the screen is in the flow path of all up- <br /> gradient plumes. If the well construction data are not available, a down-hole video log <br /> may help to isolate the plume flow paths of concern.) <br /> 4. How far is the .potable well from the leading edge of the plume? <br /> 5. Is the guard well screened appropriately to detect COCs that may threaten the potable <br /> well? <br /> The Draft Reports do not provide the necessary documentation (Items 1 through 4, above) to <br /> support any potable well sampling frequency reductions. <br /> Potable Well Contingency Plan <br /> DESJC's contingency plan proposes a potable well Warning Level concentration for each <br /> COC; the Warning Level concentration would be used to indicate when or if additional <br /> evaluation or monitoring would be warranted. However, DESJC has not also proposed levels <br /> that would trigger evaluation of alternative water supplies or that would trigger water supply <br /> replacement. Furthermore, the schedule and actions for replacement of impacted potable well <br /> water supply, such as supply of bottled water, wellhead treatment, well replacement, or <br /> alternative water supply hookup, is not provided in the contingency plan. <br /> In some cases, DESJC's proposes to use maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) as the COC <br /> Warning Levels that would trigger additional evaluation or increased monitoring. However, by <br /> the time concentrations have reached MCLs, contingencies for water supply replacement <br /> should have already been implemented. The Warning Level concentration of a COC should be <br /> the detection limit for purposes of reporting (DLR) published by the California Department of <br /> Public Health. <br /> The DESJC contingency plan must establish COC concentrations that require immediate <br /> supply of alternate water for users of potable wells. These concentrations could be called <br /> Impacted Levels and used to indicate that immediate water replacement or wellhead treatment <br /> is necessary. The Impacted Level concentration should be established by determining risk to <br /> well users. Public Health Goals established by the California Environmental Protection <br /> Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, are established in this way. The <br /> contingency plan should also set a realistic time schedule for DESJC to supply bottled water, <br /> and provide an alternate water source or wellhead treatment. <br /> DESJC should also establish contingency concentrations for guard wells that would trigger <br /> more frequent monitoring of both guard and potable wells, and would trigger an evaluation <br /> study for water supply replacement in the event that the potable well becomes impacted in the <br /> future. For example, a COC concentration in a guard well at the Warning Level could trigger <br /> increased monitoring of the guard well; a COC concentration in a guard well at the Impacted <br /> Level could trigger a water supply replacement evaluation for the potable well. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.