Laserfiche WebLink
Mr Daniel K Barber, P E <br /> September 9,2003 <br /> Page 13 of 17 <br /> ' area is in use for drinking water use (based on the well survey results), application of the <br /> drinking water standard does not appear to be appropriate However, for consideration of the <br /> ' potential impacts, the regulators generally rule by the assumption that site groundwater is a <br /> known or potential source of drinking water, unless a site-specific variance is granted The <br /> likelihood of groundwater impacts to beneficial use in this area appears to be negligible <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> ' Based on our review of the site investigation and regulatory communication data provided by <br /> D K Barber & Associates for the Western Oil & Spreading, Inc Acampo Plant Site in <br /> Acampo, California, the following conclusions were reached <br /> ■ In October 1987, five USTs were removed in two separate UST excavations at the <br /> property, along with an undisclosed amount of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil The UST <br /> excavations were located approximately 250 feet apart, the excavation in the southwestern <br /> part of the site (500-gallon gasoline UST, 1,000-gallon gasoline UST, and 2,000-gallon <br /> diesel UST) showed no contamination of regulatory concern The shallow subsurface <br /> • contamination is due mainly to the former 20,000-gallon liquid asphalt UST located <br /> in the northeastern portion of the property near monitoring well MW-1 Another area of <br /> soil contamination is also apparent near MW-4, however, there are no known sources in <br /> ' that area The soil contamination, mainly at a depth of 30 feet bgs, may reflect lateral <br /> migration into the perched aquifer zone and subsequent sorption onto the clays in the 30- <br /> to 40-foot zone <br /> ■ In a "notice of responsibility" letter dated April 25, 1997, the SJCEHD notified Western <br /> Oil & Spreading, Inc that the site could not be considered for closure until further site <br /> investigation or remedial action was completed <br /> ■ The first investigation to further define the extent of contamination occurred in 1999, with <br /> six exploratory bores from which soil and grab-groundwater samples were collected Soil <br /> contamination was noted near the current locations of wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-4, in <br /> the general area of the 20,000-gallon asphalt USTs, but was not found in the area of the <br /> ' southwestern excavation where the former gasoline and diesel USTs were located <br /> ■ A source area monitoring well (MW-1) was first installed and monitored in December <br /> 2000 By June 2002, six groundwater monitoring wells were installed to monitor the <br /> groundwater and evaluate groundwater hydrologic and hydrochemical trends <br /> ■ Site lithologic and hydrologic data show an unconfined sand-dominated sediment profile <br /> to 60 feet bgs, with groundwater generally found at the 50-foot bgs elevation What <br /> 1 <br /> Stellar Environmental Solutions <br /> ' F PRNECIS3 W3 Acve Roya100]40-OA9uMn1.oM[ImvlAywl ob FpwsiREPORT—&gsmhr RI003 doc <br />