Laserfiche WebLink
depth to groundwater will be measured in the nearby monitor well to determine whether a <br /> sample can be collected. If so,the drilling crew will collect the sample prior to advancing <br /> the CPT probe to the underlying Riverbank aquifer. The sample will be collected in a 1- <br /> liter amber bottle and preserved for laboratory analysis by EPA method 8015. <br /> All borings will be sampled in the Riverbank aquifer. The sample will be collected when <br /> the probe reaches the Modesto-Riverbank contact or when groundwater is encountered, if <br /> the soil-water interface is below the contact. In most of the existing borings,the contact is <br /> at approximately 65 feet below grade. <br /> The CPT equipment will be washed between borings to prevent cross-contamination. <br /> Task 5. Interval Pumping Tests <br /> EHD has also requested that pumping tests of each stratigraphic interval be conducted to <br /> characterize the hydrologic properties of each and to measure groundwater seepage <br /> velocities. <br /> As previously explained in written communications in November 1999 and May 2000, <br /> pumping tests of the Modesto aquifer are only feasible when the water level is at 45 feet <br /> or less in GT-10. Other wells, where the aquifer is thinner and the base is shallower, such <br /> as GT-5, could not be tested unless the water level is less than 40 feet below grade. <br /> Therefore, it is unlikely that a pumping test of this interval could be conducted in the <br /> foreseeable future unless there is a dramatic increase in rainfall that results in a rising <br /> water table. <br /> It is known from purging during previous monitoring events, as well as from hydraulic <br /> conductivity tests performed on samples from the Modesto aquitard, that this zone does <br /> not yield water readily and is quickly pumped dry in those wells that have a limited length <br /> of screen in the underlying Riverbank aquifer(GT-5, GT-6, and GT-9). Two samples <br /> from this zone in 1996 yielded hydraulic conductivities of 1.3 x 10-5 and 4.4 x 10"8. These <br /> results demonstrate that this zone is not an aquifer. Pumping this interval would cause the <br /> pumping well to go dry long before any effect is felt in any of the other monitoring wells, <br /> which are much too far away to be affected by the limited pumping that is possible from <br /> this zone. We ask EHD to reconsider the benefit of such a test. <br /> Conducting a pumping test of the Riverbank aquifer is also problematic at this time, <br /> because the three wells that are screened within this zone are 2" in diameter. In our <br /> experience,tests conducted on wells that are less than 4" in diameter are of limited effect. <br /> In addition, it is necessary to have at least one observation well that is screened within the <br /> pumping zone. The farther this well is from the pumping well,the more water must be <br /> pumped and the longer it will take for drawdown to be observed at the observation well. <br /> Wells GT-I and GT-3 are more than 30 feet apart, and GT-2 is farther still. It is possible <br /> that pumping of GT-3 might cause drawdown in GT-1, but it would be preferable to <br /> install a 4-inch or 6-inch diameter well between these wells so that they could both be <br />