Laserfiche WebLink
3.3 Analytical Results <br /> Diesel was detected in only one of the five monitoring wells (Table 2) The laboratory reported a <br /> TPH-d concentration of 320 parts per billion (ppb) in GT-9, which is up from the 61 ppb reported <br /> in March and May Concentrations in GT-5 and GT-6 declined below the detection limit of 50 ppb <br /> This is the second consecutive quarter when diesel was below the detection limit in GT-1 Tile <br /> concentration in the Gillies domestic well (G-1) also remained below the detection limit <br /> 4.0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> In the First Quarter 2003 Report we concluded that hydrocarbon concentrations have been stable fol <br /> the past nine months, and in the second quarter we extended that conclusion to the past twelve <br /> months Concentiations have apparently declined in the past three months to below the detection <br /> limit, except peihaps in GT-9 Perhaps this is related to the sharp drop in the water table, which is <br /> now near the top of the Riverbank Formation and at least 10 feet below the base of the zone of soil <br /> contamination in the Modesto Formation In our work plan dated January 22, 2003 we presented <br /> data that argued strongly against the possibility of significant groundwater contamination in the <br /> Riverbank Formation, and the results from the September sampling appear to support that <br /> argument As we have stated repeatedly in the past, it is our opinion that neither soil nol <br /> groundwater in the Riverbank Formation is significantly impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons and <br /> further investigation of the vertical extent of groundwater contamination is unnecessary As a <br /> further corollary, destruction and replacement of the Gillies domestic well would be frivolous waste <br /> of financial resources, because TPH-d was detected in only 1 of the past 11 samples from this well, <br /> at a concentiation of only 64 ppb (14 ppb above the detection limit), and groundwater elevation <br /> contour maps prepared for the past three quarters have shown no evidence that the domestic well <br /> has had any effect on the groundwater flow direction, which has been in the opposite direction <br /> Therefore, we recommend postponing all of the work tasks requested by EHD in November 2002, <br /> including further drilling, downhole camera surveys, and well destruction and replacement for at <br /> least one additional quarter to confinn the sample results obtained this quarter If the samples <br /> collected in the next quarter show that concentrations have remained below the detection limit, the <br /> wisdom of further investigation at this site should be reexamined <br /> I <br /> I <br /> 3 <br /> I <br />