Laserfiche WebLink
Wylla Satterness - Application No. GP-89-6/ZR-89-9 Page 2 <br /> Although development of agricultural land for urban purposes does <br /> not generally increase water demands (one acre of land uses 3+ AFA <br /> whether farmed or developed for medium density residential <br /> purposes) , substantial areas proposed for development have been <br /> using surface water not available for urban use. Some agricultural <br /> areas are and have been irrigated with delta water, or water from <br /> Woodbridge Irrigation District. Development of such areas will <br /> further impact the groundwater basin. <br /> Continued growth without supplemental surface water will increase <br /> the 70,000+ AFA overdraft by an unknown amount. It is probably safe <br /> to say that the increase will be on the order of 20,000+ AFA. <br /> SEWD has been working to obtain a supplemental supply of surface <br /> water. The District contracted with the USBR in December 1983 for <br /> 751000 AFA of New Melones water, and has been attempting since then <br /> to construct the 40+ mile conveyance system needed to bring she <br /> water to Stockton. <br /> The District adopted a plan for conveyance in late 1986, determined <br /> financial feasibility and contracted for design in mid 1987. The <br /> system, known as the Lower Farmington Canal-Littlejohns Creek <br /> project was estimated to cost $17 million. Feasibility studies <br /> showed that this cost could be met without increasing the wholesale <br /> cost of "treated water above the current $140 per AF and by <br /> increasing the irrigation water price from $9.12 to $15 per AF. <br /> Littlejohn Creek area owners' opposition to the project appeared at <br /> the time of the draft EIR in October 1987. It now appears that <br /> those owners are prepared to litigate the final EIR. Such <br /> litigation could delay the project indefinitely. <br /> In order that supplemental water may be available to correct the <br /> overdraft soon, the District has proposed alternative projects which <br /> avoid Littlejohn Creek. However, the alternatives will have a <br /> greater cost; $9 million to $17 million are presently estimated. If <br /> the project cost increases, SEWD will need outside assistance if the <br /> costs of treated and irrigation water are not to exceed $140 and $15 <br /> per acre foot, respectively. <br /> The SEWD and CSJWCD Boards favor a gravity supply system, and needs <br /> therefore financial assistance of approximately $13 million. <br /> Alternatives for funding include: 1) an advance from the state to <br /> be repaid by State Water Contract6rs if and when SEWD, CSJWCD, the <br /> State Department of Water Resources and the State Water Contractors <br /> agree on state participation in a local water storage project which <br /> would make some of SEWD and CSJWCD New Melones supply available for <br /> State Water Contractors use; 2) increase in the price of treated <br /> water; 3) participation by the County of San Joaquin, California <br /> Water Service, or City of Stockton; or 4) combinations of the <br /> above. <br />