Laserfiche WebLink
Paradise Point Marina -7- • 27 April 2000 <br /> Inspection Report <br /> 4. The location of the influent sampling location is both difficult and dangerous for the sample <br /> collector to access. I recommend that the Discharger either: (1) retain sample collection location <br /> and improve safety features; or, (2) move influent sample collection location by tapping a <br /> sampling port into the existing piping between collection sump and aeration chamber. <br /> 5. Even though there has been no reported history of spillage or leakage of the liquid chlorine, the <br /> Discharger must provide adequate secondary containment for chemical storage. <br /> 6. The facility appears to be adequately operated and maintained with no obvious violations of <br /> mechanical or operator processes noted during the inspection. <br /> 7. Results of our independent sample collection and analyses revealed that the effluent was in <br /> compliance with the waste discharge requirements at the date of the inspection and sampling. <br /> 8. The existing grab sampling of the influent and effluent sufficiently characterizes the quality of <br /> both parameters and should continue for the term of the existing permit. The requirement for <br /> composite sampling should be removed when the permit is renewed. <br /> 9. The Discharger should evaluate how much of the discharge is actually flowing into the larger <br /> drainage ditch and note when the pumping station is in operation. Such information will be <br /> useful in better defining the "receiving waters" and"discharge point"of the future permit. <br /> 10. An additional follow-up inspection should be scheduled for July or August to evaluate discharge <br /> conditions during the peak recreational season. <br /> Attachment: Analytical Laboratory Report <br /> Approved: ROBERT S. FAGERNESS, PE <br /> Associate Water Resources Control Engineer <br />